To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below:

Who responds to whom and for what? A grounded theory analysis of social responsibility in the 1857 Frankfurt Bienfaisance Congress

Jason Good (Amsterdam School of International Business, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands)
Bryan W. Husted (Tecnologico de Monterrey, EGADE Business School, Monterrey, Mexico)
Itzel Palomares-Aguirre (ITESO, Tlaquepaque, Mexico)
Consuelo Garcia-de-la-torre (Tecnologico de Monterrey, EGADE Business School, Monterrey, Mexico)

Journal of Management History

ISSN: 1751-1348

Article publication date: 7 December 2020

Issue publication date: 7 July 2021

300

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to examine and interpret the characteristics of social responsibility in general, and business responsibility in particular, that were evident during a period in European history that was plagued by widespread social problems and change. Based on that interpretation, the authors explore the lessons those characteristics may have for social responsibility in a contemporary world that is facing similar conditions.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper presents a qualitative analysis of the proceedings of the Bienfaisance Congress held in Frankfurt in 1857, where societal leaders from different nations met to answer the question, who has responsibility for whom, and for what? The authors use grounded theory, as it is operationalized in what is known as the “Gioia template,” to conduct a structured analysis of this particular text, and to in turn produce a theoretical interpretation of how that question was answered.

Findings

The interpretation from this study is that congress participants articulated certain established dimensions of responsibility (individual, organizational, national), as well as one new dimension (international), and did so by differentiating boundaries of responsibility; in turn, the authors suggest that these dimensions and boundaries work together to form a nested system of responsibilities.

Research limitations/implications

There is limited empirical evidence available that documents the variety of responsibility-based initiatives that were being conducted during the 19th century. An analysis of the congress proceedings allows us to gain a better understanding of how the 19th-century world, particularly the upper echelons of European society, approached the question of under what conditions actors in different domains have responsibility for another. While the implications are limited by the analysis of the proceedings of one congress that was attended by elites, they do provide a snapshot of how Europe sought to articulate a system of bounded responsibilities during a time of widespread social problems and change.

Practical implications

Although the nested system of responsibilities framework that emerged from the grounded theory analysis is not applicable to all situations, it should sensitize policymakers and business leaders to the need to address social problems in a systemic way.

Originality/value

The authors both present a systems-based framework for understanding how responsibility is differentiated among actors (individual, organizational, state and international) and demonstrate how a theoretical interpretation of historical documents can be accomplished through the use of grounded theory, as operationalized through the Gioia template.

Keywords

Citation

Good, J., Husted, B.W., Palomares-Aguirre, I. and Garcia-de-la-torre, C. (2021), "Who responds to whom and for what? A grounded theory analysis of social responsibility in the 1857 Frankfurt Bienfaisance Congress", Journal of Management History, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 359-388. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-01-2020-0007

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles