Parliamentary engagement in fighting corruption: a discourse on the Parliament of Tanzania

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to examine the participation of the Parliament of Tanzania in the fight against corruption in the country.

Design/methodology/approach

A desk-based research approach based on the review of documents and legal instruments was used.

Findings

The results of this study show that the Parliament of Tanzania has a chequered performance in fighting corruption. While it has passed several anti-corruption-related laws and in some respects succeeded to hold a few government officials accountable for the abuse of public office, there is little evidence to demonstrate its contribution at fighting this conundrum. Factors contributing to this deficiency include irresponsiveness to corruption allegations involving Members of Parliament, parliament’s remote oversight of the anti-corruption agency and shrinking democratic space in the parliament.

Practical implications

Tanzania has relatively high corruption levels. The country’s Development Vision 2025 envisages a nation free of corruption. Hence, efforts are needed from public and private sectors to overcome this conundrum. The parliament holds a special place in that fight. Through its representation, legislative and oversight roles and powers, parliament has a wider opportunity to strengthen anti-corruption in the country. This study shows that the Parliament of Tanzania has not been very effective in that regard. It offers suggestions to strengthen the parliament’s position and engagement to fight corruption.

Originality/value

There is scanty literature on the role of the Parliament of Tanzania in fighting corruption. This study is seminal, as it investigates the Tanzanian anti-corruption arsenal from a crucial organ that is vested with constitutional powers to make laws and oversee the executive and its agencies.

Citation

Lukiko, L.V. (2023), "Parliamentary engagement in fighting corruption: a discourse on the Parliament of Tanzania", Journal of Financial Crime, Vol. 30 No. 5, pp. 1182-1193. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-06-2022-0130