# Prospects of applying 3-D printing to economics of remote communities: Reindeer herder case

Svetlana Obydenkova (School of Industrial Engineering and Management, Department of Energy Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden)
Nicholas C. Anzalone (Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Michigan Technological University, USA)
Joshua M. Pearce (Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Michigan Technological University, USA)

ISSN: 1750-6204

Publication date: 3 September 2018

## Abstract

### Purpose

Isolated communities face a variety of inconveniences including severe remoteness, poor roads and extreme climate conditions, resulting in the lack of security of supply chains and exorbitant prices for cargo delivery. This paper aims to investigate the present advantages and prospects of applying 3-D printing to improve economics and everyday life of remote communities, reindeer herder case taken as an example.

### Design/methodology/approach

This study covers the use of a low-cost open-source 3-D printer (RepRap) capable of fused filament fabrication to reduce operating costs for nomadic reindeer herder groups. Three case studies are provided for reindeer-specific applications to probe economic and technical viability of the technology, namely, ear-tags, electric fence components and lasso accessories.

### Findings

3-D printed objects feature technical characteristics similar to those of analogues available on the market while reducing the price by 63 per cent. Distributed 3-D printing reduces the cost of raw materials by 68 per cent and shipping costs by 50 because of lower trip frequency. If all reindeer herders globally were to adopt distributed manufacturing of the three aforementioned sample items only, their annual savings from such solution would amount to US$2m. The paper discovers other economic, entrepreneurial, technical and environmental opportunities offered by 3-D printing put to service the needs of remote communities. ### Research limitations As the paper is the first-ever study of 3-D printing potential applied to the reindeer husbandry case, it is based on a more thorough analysis of the techno-economic feasibility of the technology, while cultural and entrepreneurial factors have been discussed as preconditions only. ### Practical implications The paper might serve as a valuable source of information for entrepreneurs, as well as for students and academics for further case studies in this area. ### Originality/value In remote conditions, 3-D printing offers a more sustainable way of good manufacturing. Numerous open source designs already available for specialists, financial effectiveness, environmental benefits and vast opportunities for entrepreneurs are among the most promising advantages of the technology. ## Keywords #### Citation Obydenkova, S., Anzalone, N. and Pearce, J. (2018), "Prospects of applying 3-D printing to economics of remote communities", Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 488-509. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-08-2016-0029 Download as .RIS ### Publisher : Emerald Publishing Limited Copyright © 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited ## 1. Introduction The release of the RepRap (self-REPlicating RAPid prototyper) under open-source licenses has radically decreased the costs, while increasing the access to 3-D printers (Sells et al., 2009; Jones et al., 2011; Bowyer, 2014; Rundle, 2014). It has been shown that using a RepRap to fabricate end products can reduce costs for both high-end products like scientific equipment (Pearce, 2012; 2013; Wijnen et al., 2014; Baden et al., 2015; Wittbrodt et al., 2015) and for conventional mass-manufactured consumer goods (Gershenfeld, 2005; Bradshaw et al., 2010; Wittbrodt et al., 2013; Wohlers and Caffrey, 2014). The number of open source designs of all types has been rising exponentially (Wittbrodt et al., 2013), which increases the value for the printers for owners. Several studies have indicated that 3-D printers would also be useful for sustainable development (Pearce et al., 2010; Birtchnell and Hoyle, 2014; Ishengoma and Mtaho, 2014). These applications have focused primarily on issues related to communities in warm climates in the global south. For example, most small farmers in the developing world use labor-intensive agricultural hand tools and there has been some indications that superior tools can be developed and 3-D printed improving the efficiency of agriculture in the developing world (Ishengoma and Mtaho, 2014) and recent developments have indicated this could be happening (Pearce, 2015). However, northern groups of indigenous people who live as nomadic reindeer herders face a variety of inconveniences, namely the dramatic remoteness of herders’ camps from industrial centers, poor roads or even the full absence of them, extreme climate conditions, a difficult landscape and low population density in the regions where reindeer husbandry takes place. Therefore, they might experience dire challenges related to the lack of security in supply chains (Solvang and Hakam, 2010) and exorbitant prices for cargo delivery (Yu et al., 2014; Hageback and Segerstedt, 2004). Research in distributed manufacturing with solar-powered RepRaps (King et al., 2014) has shown that isolated communities are capable of making an assortment of products for themselves on location (Gwamuri et al., 2014; Khan et al., 2018). This study investigates the viability and prospects of low-cost open-source 3-D printer capable of fused filament fabrication plastic manufacturing to reduce the operating costs for nomadic reindeer herders as the example of the development of 3-D printing for rural application. It is assumed that reindeer herders can make use of more than million open source designs for common consumer items just as any consumer might; however, here three case studies are provided (ear-tag, electric fence components, and lasso accessory) for reindeer-specific applications to probe the economic and technical viability of adopting this technology in nomadic northern communities. The economic evaluation has been prepared based on retailer prices for raw materials and the 3-D printer model, available literature data on reindeer husbandry and incumbent logistics data. ## 2. Literature review ### 2.1 Reindeer husbandry and indigenous communities Reindeer herding is a unique lifestyle featuring a basically nomadic existence spread remotely into the northern hemisphere and, quite often, in areas with extreme climate conditions (The International Center for Reindeer Husbandry; UN). Reindeer husbandry is typical for the northern groups of indigenous people who have developed this business over centuries and constitutes the main part of income for such communities (Filppa, 2005; Tyler et al., 2007; Dana, 2008). As such indigenous communities rely on a large extent on reindeer meat, milk and hides in their everyday life, their prosperity depends essentially on livestock well-being, and husbandry traditions are linked inherently to the local culture (Filppa, 2005; Dana, 2008; Roturier and Roué, 2009; Dana and Riseth, 2011). Nonetheless, at the same time, northern indigenous communities are able to successfully adopt innovations (Dana, 2008; Obydenkova and Pearce, 2016). The profound interaction of business and culture was found to be common also for northern rural settlements featuring activities other than reindeer husbandry such as fishing (Holen, 2009). In spite of discernible community self-sufficiency in terms of natural food supply, there is still a demand for externally made goods for businesses or for other community needs. However, under the dramatic remoteness and extreme natural conditions found where these communities live, this can result in exorbitant fuel costs for transportation being added on to the cost of goods (Usher et al., 1994; Obydenkova and Pearce, 2016). Personal income of a reindeer herdsman is relatively low (Jernsletten and Klokov, 2002; Reinert, 2006; Tyler et al., 2007; Dana and Light, 2011), as the herder needs to invest significant part of the family income into technical tool purchases and maintenance, as well as into transportation costs. The latter can become a major issue in severe northern conditions and, is observed quite often, in a mountainous territory (Jernsletten and Klokov, 2002; Yu et al., 2014). Therefore, herders might be interested in a new business model allowing them to obtain high-demand items at request and for a lower price, and on terms that do not compromise their cultural identity. Such a model may become possible via the involvement of distributed manufacturing with 3-D printing (Laplume et al., 2016). Because of a variety of pre-conditions, modern reindeer husbandry has unique features, including those related to the business model applied, social, demographic and entrepreneurial specialties and culture. Husbandry can involve both indigenous people, such as Sámi, Evenki, Nenets and Khanty, and other nationalities irrelevant to indigenous people that can make difference in the approach towards business development. Traditionally, reindeer husbandry is a family or even a community-based business, several families uniting in small groups, co-operatives, crews or brigades (Filppa, 2005; Tyler et al., 2007; Dana and Riseth, 2011; UN). This feature, undoubtedly, adds a uniqueness to the entrepreneurial model applied (Ramadani and Hoy, 2015). Although within such a unit livestock is officially owned by an individual herdsman, the herd is served and profit is shared between community members (Dana, 2008; Dana and Riseth, 2011; UN). On the contrary, as it was found in the Finland case, non-indigenous reindeer owners behave more as conventional entrepreneurs (Dana and Riseth, 2011). For Russia, where the number of people potentially involved in reindeer husbandry and identified as indigenous, accounts for well over one hundred thousand individuals (The Russian national census, 2010), it was found common that women play the leading role in a community, becoming officially entrepreneur, i.e. the reindeers’ legal owner, but still remaining in a profound connection with other community members. Nonetheless, to maintain community income, women are often involved in other activities, e.g. carving, fur, clothes, felt, handicraft and jewelry manufacturing (Dana and Riseth, 2011; UN). As opposed to a consensual view, rural communities generally feature necessary prerequisites for the development of entrepreneurship (Williams, 2011), e.g. some reindeer herder groups have been practicing agricultural trade for a long time (Reinert, 2006; Mason et al., 2012). However, to prove its success, the business model will require a thorough analysis of community entrepreneurial features that could be accomplished via quantitative and/or qualitative, or a so-called comprehensive research, where, among others, holistic inductive strategy, supplementing quantitative methods, will benefit for the better understanding of local entrepreneurship opportunities (Dana and Dana, 2005; Dana and Dumez, 2015). The latter originate from the evaluation of the entrepreneur nature and its close connections with culture and environment (Dana and Dana, 2005). To this end, Dana and Dana (2005) indicated that completing a case study would be useful for the consideration of different aspects of entrepreneurial environment. ### 2.2 RepRap 3-D printing 3-D printers are based on the principle of additive manufacturing and can use a variety of materials, such as polymers, ceramics and metals, among which the open source RepRap polymer-based 3-D printer has become the most popular (Pearce, 2013; Wohlers and Caffrey, 2014). A RepRap 3-D printer works by pushing plastic filament (generally 3 or 1.75 mm in diameter) through an extruder, melting it and depositing a 2-D pattern on the substrate. The extruder is then moved up a fraction of a millimeter (normally 0.10-0.35 mm) and the next layer of the 3-D printed object is deposited. The process repeats until the entire object has been fabricated. There are many RepRap derivatives freely available on the internet (RepRap.org) that can be built for a small investment. For example, the MOST Delta RepRap costs under$450 in parts and can be built in approximately 8 h once the bill of materials has been collected (Irwin et al., 2014; MOST, 2014). There are also commercially available RepRaps (such as the Lulzbot Taz), which can also be upgraded by printing replacement parts. Polylactic acid (PLA) used as raw material for RepRap features strong biodegradable and recyclable properties (Gu and Catchmark, 2013; Kreiger and Pearce, 2013).

3-D printing has already come into common use (Wohlers and Caffrey, 2014): it has been put to work, for instance, in jewelry and spectacle manufacturing (Rayna and Striukova, 2016), and it was recognized to be advantageous for the sustainable development of rural communities based on small-scale organic agriculture (Pearce, 2015).

As it was discussed earlier, indigenous communities are already applying a series of modern technologies in their everyday life, e.g. computers and GPS (Dana, 2008; Obydenkova and Pearce, 2016), that presumably means the readiness to furthermore adopt such disruptive innovation technologies as 3-D printing. Additionally, as it was shown, firms and entrepreneurs may benefit on the development of such technologies (Rayna and Striukova, 2016; Gërguri-Rashiti et al., 2017).

## 3. Methods

### 4.2 Electric fence components

A parametric customizable electric fence component was successfully designed and printed in PLA, weighing 4 g as shown in Plate 2.

Potential economic savings from this case study have been calculated to be more than a million US dollars per year (Table VIII).

### 4.3 Lasso accessory

A parametric customizable lasso accessory successfully 3-D printed. The exact weight will depend on the infill and the custom dimensions. Here, the default printed in low-resolution on a TAZ-mini is 27.3 g and is shown in Plate 3.

The annual saving from the three object classes in the current case study amounts to US$255,033 (Table VIII). One of the most important material properties of the objects is the accessory’s tensile strength, as it must withstand a material load when a reindeer is caught and held. The average tensile strength of PLA amounts to 56.6 MPa (Tymrak et al., 2014). Although the item made of compact dry antler bone is supposed to withstand higher loads, according to Rajaram and Ramanathan (1982), tensile strength of a wet and dry compact antler bone is 108 ± 5.1 and 188 ± 12 MPa, respectively. The mechanical characteristics of PLA are in the same range as those of nylon and polyester, which lasso ropes are usually being made of indicating that the accessory should be adequately strong for this application. Made of PLA, the tool would be perfectly suitable for the application with the purposes of training. ## 5. Discussion The implementation of 3-D printing technology for the local good manufacturing and its contribution to the development of reindeer herding communities should be considered from a number of aspects, namely, from (i) economic and (ii) environmental point of view, (iii) mitigation of risks in the supply chain, (iv) development of entrepreneurship and (v) taking into account other advanced features that become available because of the local 3-D printing manufacturing. ### 5.1 Economic means As it has been shown, the total price for the goods’ manufacturing on-site with use of 3-D printing technology, including surplus transportation payment for raw material delivery, can be decreased by 63.2 per cent compared to the cost of ready-made article purchase and delivery (Figure 2). Price breakdown of 3-D printed objects is as follows: 63.4 per cent is the cost of raw materials and 36.6 per cent is the shipping cost. The cost reduction is mainly because of manufacturing process, (decrease by 68.4 per cent) and lesser for surplus transportation payment, which is reduced with the use of 3-D printing by half because of a decrease in the number of trips. Thus, with the total annual saving from the project of over US$2m globally, the average saving per reindeer herding group would amount to US$307.70 that, given only three types of 3D manufactured items used, would account for 1.6 per cent of a herder’s annual income as it was reported by (Tyler et al., 2007). As one of the main goals of the project was to prove the viability of the local 3-D printing manufacturing, the economic evaluations as above consider only the most significant expenses and do not consider such aspects as amortization, which actually can be applied for both 3-D printer ant vehicle and inflation. The simple payback period of the project for a community using LulzBot Mini 3-D Printer that costs US$1,350 (www.lulzbot.com/catalog), a pi-top that costs US$300 and the photovoltaic power for them both that costs US$600 and keeping shipping cost at the level of at least 30 per cent from the total sum, amounts roughly to 9.5 years. This is a positive high return on investment, but still a long time for a household to wait for a return. However, it must be pointed out that this simple payback is for only the three example items investigated here. There are more than a million open source 3-D printable objects already available on the Web and previous students have shown that consumers can save substantial sums manufacturing their own products (Wittbrodt et al., 2015). Nevertheless, a more accurate calculation of the actual use and products printed by herders is needed to provide accurate project payback periods for this application.

Options for a further price reductions and value increases and, therefore, payback period reductions given the ample use of sustainable and economical distributed 3-D printing for herder needs may include the reutilization of wasted goods (Kreiger et al., 2014), the delivery of a higher raw material load per one trip and increasing workload for 3-D printer allowing more useful/valuable objects to be manufactured as it may be required.

Technical limitations arising for implementation of distributed 3-D printing technology into reindeer husbandry are mainly related to solar radiation conditions specific for sub-Arctic and Arctic regions. However, since, all the considered printable objects are required, mainly, during spring and summer seasons, when daily radiation reaches its maximal values [e.g. for northern part of Norway, up to 3.5 kWh/m2/day in April and more than 5.5 kWh/m2/day in June (NASA Atmospheric Science Data Center, 2015)], solar conditions might not be crucial for the project. Future experimental work is needed in the field to verify this potential.

### 5.2 Environmental impact minimization

PLA used for the item manufacturing refers to biodegradable nonhazardous materials produced from bio-sugar-based sources (Gu and Catchmark, 2013). Kreiger and Pearce (2013) proved through conducting the life-cycle analysis a sensible reduction of life cycle GHG emissions for a set of items manufactured from PLA on-site using a RepRap printer coupled with solar photovoltaic arrays when compared to conventional manufacturing.

An additional environmental benefit can be expected from the reduction of cargo transportation that may turn out significant because of the dramatic remoteness of reindeer grazing areas, a difficult landscape and a low population density, resulting in the necessity for the individual delivery of goods. As it has been shown in the Norwegian case, an average cargo roundtrip from the nearest distribution center to the reindeer grazing area (i.e. for the individual reindeer herding group) amounts to 240 km.

The amount of GHG originating from burning gasoline in vehicle engines can be calculated based on specific figures of emissions per unit of distance driven, provided by the US Environmental Protection Agency for light-duty trucks featuring gasoline consumption of 0.14 L/km (EPA, 2008). Thus, assuming that the introduction of 3-D printing for the local goods manufacturing allows to reduce freight traffic by at least 50 per cent, annual avoided CO2 tailpipe emissions can reach 0.077 tons per one herder’s group and, globally, 0.5 to 1.1 kTCO2 depending on the calculation of the number of herder groups worldwide. To compare, in 2008, CO2 emissions originating from the US commercial light trucks amounted to 42.64 MMT (Greene et al., 2011). The latter figure may imply a great potential for the reduction of GHG emissions from the existing commercial transportation. A full life-cycle analysis is needed to quantify the environmental impact reduction used for distributed manufacturing with 3-D printing in this context.

### 5.3 Mitigation of risks in supply chain

Other obvious advantages that might be offered by the use of 3-D printing for the local goods manufacturing is the attainment of self-sufficiency in the supply chain, that as it was discussed can be of a serious concern for herders settled in mountain areas exposed to the extreme Arctic and sub-Arctic climate (Solvang and Hakam, 2010), and one of the main advantages of 3-D printing contributing to a more secure supply chain is its uniform raw material input. The latter feature implies that after 3-D printing introduction, the variety of products to be supplied to the site shrinks notably, allowing to develop a more efficient logistics for the supplies.

### 5.4 Development of entrepreneurship

As it was discussed in the literature review section, rural communities feature existing prerequisites for the development of entrepreneurship (Williams, 2011). Moreover, numerous studies supported by facts from our collaboration with northern indigenous communities have indicated at the willingness of those communities to develop other trading lines. For instance, on occasion, herder wives are creating and selling handicrafts, local footwear and clothes that in its turn feature different plastic details (e.g. beads) that can be fabricated with the use of a 3-D printer.

On the other hand, in spite of a gradual increase in the 3-D printer affordability, there is still a recognizable gap between local and household fabrication, where the first one refers to so called direct digital manufacturing where a business model implies that goods are printed at a community printshop (Rayna and Striukova, 2016). However, the latter can be beneficial for herders, given that traditional reindeer husbandry, as it was discussed in the literature section, basically follows the community-based entrepreneurial model. Laplume et al. (2016) have also showed that at the current printer price, the 3-D printing business model has become already viable and can offer essential profitability if a printer is set to serve community needs.

From the point of view of entrepreneurship development, such performance would signify that a local entrepreneur’s use of 3-D printing would be able to hike their revenues significantly from producing goods on-site and on request. This assumption becomes more plausible if a spectrum of applications where the use of 3-D printing technology has already proved its feasibility, e.g. for printing jewelry objects, spectacles (Rayna and Striukova, 2016), is considered.

As Smith (2012) indicated, “entrepreneurship is about effecting change”, that can be interpreted for an indigenous community practicing reindeer husbandry as a model of activity resulting in a higher community prosperity without compromising cultural values, the latter found of a very significant importance for those people. As it was discussed in the literature (Dana, 2008; Obydenkova and Pearce, 2016), reindeer herders already use a wide range of technological innovation and can be anticipated to continue to adopt new technologies in the future. The current case study has revealed the possibility to use printable on-site objects (e.g. ear-tags and fence insulators) instead of purchasing similar items for higher prices without damaging indigenous traditions.

Several other advanced features related to the local goods manufacturing with the use of 3-D printing might be considered.

In the area of the local ear-tag manufacturing, the technology provides opportunities for an imminent addition to the label of other information that might be helpful for herding (e.g. sex and the most important medical records), allows to control the number of printed tags dependent on real birth rate data and promotes the possibility of an urgent replacement of an ear-tag in the case of its damage or loss.

The use of temporary electric fences, that may become more realistic with local 3-D printing manufacturing of the plastic fence patterns (such as insulators and others), provides more efficient protection from predators such as wolves, bears and lynxes (Knipe, 1985) threatening both calves and adult reindeer (Anderson et al., 2014; Godkin, 1986; Sami Statistics, 2010; Tyler et al., 2007). This can be a significant benefit. For example, the yearly rate of calve losses in Finnmark and Norway reaches up to 30-65 per cent (Tyler et al., 2007). Moreover, as such types of fences are set to be used during the summer season, the installation can benefit from the use of solar photovoltaic technology as the source of power (NREL, 1997). To this point, Obydenkova and Pearce (2016), while investigating the feasibility of solar photovoltaics set to serve electric needs of herder nomadic camps in areas of reindeer husbandry deployment, showed the competitiveness of energy supply from photovoltaic compared to fuel-based systems.

The other obvious advantage of electric fences compared to the conventional wooden ones is a more modest demand for timber for fence construction that otherwise may become an issue on remote locations, especially in tundra, and, additionally, a conventional fence might be up to ten times more expensive than electric one (Worley, 2015).

## 6. Implications, future research and conclusions

This paper considers the feasibility of 3-D printing technology to be used for the local good manufacturing for the needs of the reindeer herder society. Three case studies of 3-D printable objects have been explored: ear-tags, electric fence components and a reindeer lasso accessory. The articles were designed and printed with the use of the RepRap 3-D printers using free and open source software. All objects have been successfully printed and featured similar characteristics to those available on the market.

The results point at a potential significant reduction in prices for goods manufactured via 3-D printing on-site, by 63.2 per cent in total, which is because of both lesser cost of manufacturing and reduced transportation costs. The cost of the latter is reduced by half because of a decrease in the number of trips.

The total annual saving from the project amounts to over US$2m globally or, on the average basis, US$307 per one reindeer herding group.

The investigation of other features of 3-D printing development trends that can benefit remote rural community has revealed opportunities for the mitigation of environmental impact, the development of entrepreneurship and the enhancement of agricultural practices, in reindeer husbandry in particular, without compromising the cultural identity of indigenous lifestyle.

The precise cases covered by this study represent a significant interest in terms of the project’s further potential expansion, as reindeer husbandry is only one segment of farming, and hence, those studies may be promising for many other farming segments from economic and environmental points of view.

It should be also noted that as the paper is the first-ever study of 3-D printing potential applied to the reindeer husbandry case, it is based on a more thorough analysis of the techno-economic feasibility of the technology, while cultural and entrepreneurial factors have been discussed as preconditions only. Undoubtedly, to develop a successful business model, the latter requires an even more detailed investigation, especially with the involvement of a holistic–inductive research, as suggested by Dana and Dana (2005), that becomes increasingly important given cultural features intrinsic to such communities.

## Figures

#### Figure 1.

The figure-8 pattern made of Hartshorn, manufactured by the Russian Evenks

#### Plate 1.

3-D Printed ear-tag. PLA is in grey and NinjaFlex in black

#### Plate 2.

3-D Printed electric fence insulator

#### Plate 3.

Lasso accessory – fully parametric and able to be customize, size and color

#### Figure 2.

Total articles cost: manufactured off-site and on-site with use of 3-D printer

## Table I.

Yearly required number of ear-tags which can be manufactured by 3-D printing

Country No. of reindeers Rate of calves (%) No. of ear-tags required per year
Finland (Filppa, 2005) 201,058 48.5 97,513
Canada (Godkin, 1986) 12,800 23.4 2,995
Sweden (Moen, 2008) 225,000 36.0 81,000
Norway (Sami Statistics, 2010) 252,410 90,868
The USA (Alaska) (Jernsletten and Klokov, 2002) 17,650 6,354
Mongolia (The International Center for Reindeer Husbandry) 700 252
China 1,000 360
Total 708,588

## Table II.

Yearly herder group expenses for ear-tags

Country The yearly expenses for the ear-tags, US $/year(a) By reindeer herding group By country Finland 241 166,290 Norway 195 169,065 Sweden 150,735 Russia 804,920 The USA, Alaska 11,861 Mongolia 390 China 585 Canada 149 6,556 Total 1,310,402 Note: (a) Including expenses for good purchase and delivery ## Table III. Insulator specification for electric fencing according to Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries (1996) Material No. per 1 km of level terrain Line insulators (nail or screw onto post) 328 Tie-off insulators 12 (assuming at least 4 change of direction) ## Table IV. Yearly required number of insulators for electric fencing which can be manufactured by 3-D printing Country No. of Reindeer-Herding Groups No. of insulators for electric fence required per year (by country) Line insulators Tie-off insulators Total Finland 690 452,640 16,560 469,200 Norway 867 568,752 20,808 589,560 Sweden 773 507,088 18,552 525,640 The USA, Alaska 61 40,016 1,464 41,480 Mongolia 2 1,312 48 1,360 China 3 1,968 72 2,040 Russia 4,124 2,705,344 98,976 2,804,320 Canada 44 28,864 1,056 29,920 Total 4,305,984 157,536 4,463,520 ## Table V. Yearly expenses for electric fence insulators Country Yearly expenses for electric fence insulators, US$/year(a)
By Reindeer Herding Group By country
Finland 230.6 159,114
Norway 199,930
Sweden 178,254
Mongolia 461
China 692
Russia 950,994
Total 1,513,658
Note:
(a)

Including expenses for good purchase and delivery

## Table VI.

Number of accessories for the lasso which can be manufactured by 3-D printing

Country No. of people potentially involved in Reindeer husbandry Approx. rate of adolescents and adults(a), % of total pop No. of the lasso accessories
Finland (Filppa, 2005; Index Mundi, 2018) 5,344 64.4 3,442
Norway (Sami statistics, 2010; Sami in Sweden) 57,500 74.7 42,953
Sweden (Sami in Sweden; Index Mundi, 2018) 30,000 63.2 18,960
The USA, Alaska (Jernsletten and Klokov, 2002) 150 (number of people directly involved in the reindeer husbandry) 150
Mongolia (The International Center for Reindeer Husbandry;
Index Mundi, 2018)
200 69.1 138
China (The International Center for Reindeer Husbandry;
Index Mundi, 2018)
234 73.3 172
Russia (The Russian national census, 2010) 138,206 67.6 93,427
Total 161,993
Note:
(a)

The figure refers to approx. rate of people between 15 (19 in some cases) and 69, age groups of potential users of lasso

## Table VII.

Yearly expenses for lasso accessory made of hartshorn

Country Yearly expenses for lasso accessory, US $/year By reindeer herding group By country Finland 11.5 7,932 Norway 114.2 98,979 Sweden 56.5 43,690 The USA, Alaska 5.7 346 Mongolia 159 318 China 132.1 396 Russia 52.2 215,288 Canada 144.1 6,339 Total 373,288 ## Table VIII. Saving estimates from distributed manufacturing of ear-tags, electric fence insulators and lasso accessories Component Mass (g) Raw material cost + Shipping cost (US$/kg)
Cost per component
(US $/component) Total annual cost for all 3-D printed manufactured case study items Total potential annual savings, (US$/year)
Manufacturing Delivery For all manufactured articles, (US$/year) For raw materials delivery, (US$/year)
Ear-tag case study
Tag 17.7 32 + 11.69 $0.57$0.21 403,895 148,803 742,115
Plug 0.8 15 + 11.69 $0.012$0.01 8,503 7,086
Electric fence insulators case study
Electric insulator 4 15 + 11.69 $0.06$0.05 267,811 223,176 1,022,671
Lasso accessory case study
Figure-8 lasso accessory 27.3 15 + 11.69 $0.41$0.32 66,417 51,838 255,033
Total 746,626 430,903 2,019,819

## References

Anderson, D.G., Ineshin, E.M., Kulagina, N.V., Lavento, M. and Vinkovskaya, O.P. (2014), “Landscape agency and evenki-iakut reindeer husbandry along the Zhuia river, Eastern Siberia”, Human Ecology, Vol. 42 No. 2, pp. 249-266.

Andersen, O. (2011), “Reindeer-herding cultures in Northern Nordland, Norway: methods for documenting traces of reindeer herders in the landscape and for dating reindeer-herding activities”, Quaternary International, Vol. 238 Nos 1/2, pp. 63-75.

Baden, T., Chagas, A.M., Gage, G., Marzullo, T., Prieto-Godino, L.L. and Euler, T. (2015), “Open Labware: 3-D printing your own lab equipment”, PLOS Biology, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 1-12.

Baskin, L.M. (2005), “Number of wild and domestic reindeer in Russia in the late 20th century”, Rangifer, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 51-57.

Beach, H. (2007), “Reindeer ears: calf marking during the contemporary era of extensive herding in Swedish Saamiland”, Annales Societatis Litterarum Humaniorum Regiae Upsaliensis, ISSN 0349-0416, pp. 91-118, (accessed 15 September 2015).

Birtchnell, T. and Hoyle, W. (2014), 3D Printing for Development in the Global South: The 3D4D Challenge, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.

Bloomberg Business (2015), “Bloomberg business”, available at: www.bloomberg.com/quote/USDNOK:CUR (accessed 14 September 2015).

Bowyer, A. (2014), “3D printing and humanity’s first imperfect replicator”, 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 4-5.

Bradshaw, S., Bowyer, A. and Haufe, P. (2010), “The intellectual property implications of low-cost 3D printing”, ScriptEd, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 5-31.

Clarke, A. and Dieterich, R. (1990), “Record keeping for reindeer herds”, (accessed 15 September 2015).

Dana, L. (2008), “Community-based entrepreneurship in Norway”, The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 77-92.

Dana, L. and Dana, T. (2005), “Expanding the scope of methodologies used in entrepreneurship research”, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 79-88.

Dana, L. and Dumez, H. (2015), “Qualitative research revisited: epistemology of a comprehensive approach”, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 154-170.

Dana, L. and Light, I. (2011), “Two forms of community entrepreneurship in Finland: are there differences between Finnish and Sámi reindeer husbandry entrepreneurs?”, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Vol. 23 Nos 5/6, pp. 331-352.

Dana, L. and Riseth, J. (2011), “Reindeer herders in Finland: pulled to community-based entrepreneurship and pushed to individualistic firms”, The Polar Journal, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 108-123.

Dana, L. and Dumez, H. (2015), “Qualitative research revisited: epistemology of a comprehensive approach”, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 154-170.

Duodjin (2015), “Lasso ring/&#269; Oarvegiella”, (accessed 4 September 2015).

Ebay (2015), (accessed 28 September 2015).

EPA (2008), “Average annual emissions and fuel consumption for gasoline-fueled passenger cars and light trucks – emission facts”, (EPA420-F-08-024), available at: www3.epa.gov/otaq/consumer/420f08024.pdf (accessed 10 August 2016).

Filppa, J. (2005), “Reindeer husbandry in Finland”, Rangifer, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 59-62.

Gershenfeld, N. (2005), Fab: The Coming Revolution on Your Desktop – from Personal Computers to Personal Fabrication, Basic Books, New York.

Godkin, G. (1986), “The reindeer industry in Canada”, The Canadian Veterinary Journal = La Revue Veterinaire Canadienne, Vol. 27 No. 12, pp. 488-490.

Gërguri-Rashiti, S., Ramadani, V., Abazi-alili, H., Dana, L. and Ratten, V. (2017), “ICT, innovation and firm performance: the transition economies context”, Thunderbird International Business Review, Vol. 59 No. 1, pp. 93-102.

Greene, D.L., Baker, H.H. and Plotkin, S.E. (2011), Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from US Transportation, Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Arlington, VA.

Gu, J. and Catchmark, J.M. (2013), “Polylactic acid composites incorporating casein functionalized cellulose nanowhiskers”, Journal of Biological Engineering, Vol. 7 No. 1, p. 110.

Gwamuri, J., Wittbrodt, B.T., Anzalone, N.C. and Pearce, J.M. (2014), “Reversing the trend of large scale and centralization in manufacturing: the case of distributed manufacturing of customizable 3-D-printable self-adjustable glasses”, Challenges in Sustainability, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 30-40.

Hageback, C. and Segerstedt, A. (2004), “The need for co-distribution in rural areas – a study of Pajala in Sweden”, International Journal Production Economics, Vol. 89 No. 2, pp. 153-163.

Holen, D. (2009), “The dynamic context of cultural and social sustainability of communities in Southwest Alaska”, Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 306-316.

Index Mundi (2018), “Age distribution by country”, available at: www.indexmundi.com (accessed 5 July 2018).

International Center for Reindeer Husbandry (2015), available at: http://reindeerherding.org/ (accessed 15 July 2015).

Irwin, J.L., Pearce, J.M., Anzolone, G. and Oppliger, D.E. (2014), “The RepRap 3-D printer revolution in STEM education”, 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,

Ishengoma, F.R. and Mtaho, A.B. (2014), “3D Printing: developing countries perspectives”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.5349.

Jones, R., Haufe, P., Sells, E., Iravani, P., Olliver, V., Palmer, C. and Bowyer, A. (2011), “RepRap – the replicating rapid prototype”, Robotica, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 177-191.

King, D.L., Babasola, A., Rozario, J. and Pearce, J.M. (2014), “Mobile open-source solar-powered 3-D printers for distributed manufacturing in off-grid communities”, Challenges in Sustainability, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 18-27.

Khan, K.Y., Gauchia, L. and Pearce, J.M. (2018), “Self-sufficiency of 3-D printers: utilizing stand-alone solar photovoltaic power systems”, Renewables: Wind, Water, and Solar, Vol. 5 No. 1, doi: 10.1186/s40807-018-0051-6.

Knipe, O.D. (1985), “Predator-deterrent electric fence for rough terrain”, Rangelands, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 148-153.

Kreiger, M.A. and Pearce, J.M. (2013), “Environmental life cycle analysis of distributed 3-D printing and conventional manufacturing of polymer products”, ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, Vol. 1 No. 12, pp. 1511-1519.

Kreiger, M.A., Mulder, M.L., Glover, A.G. and Pearce, J.M. (2014), “Life cycle analysis of distributed recycling of post-consumer high density polyethylene for 3-D printing filament”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 70, pp. 90-96.

Jernsletten, J.L. and Klokov, K. (2002), Sustainable Reindeer Husbandry, Arctic Council, Centre for Saami Studies, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway.

Landbruksdirektoratet (2013), “Reindeer herding in Troms”, available at: www.reinddrift.no (accessed 14 September 2015).

Laplume, A., Anzalone, G.C. and Pearce, J.M. (2016), “Open-source, self-replicating 3-D printer factory for small-business manufacturing”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 85 Nos 1/4, pp. 633-642.

Mason, A.H.M., Anderson, R.B. and Dana, L.P. (2012), “Inuit culture and opportunity recognition for commercial caribou harvests in the bio economy”, Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 194-212.

Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries (1996), “Livestock control: electric fence design”, Fencing Factsheet, pp. 1-10, (accessed 14 September 2015).

Moen, J. (2008), “Climate change: effects on the ecological basis for reindeer husbandry in Sweden”, AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, Vol. 37 No. 4, pp. 304-311, available at: https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2008)37[304:CCEOTE]2.0.CO;2

MOST (2014), “Delta build overview: MOST”, available at: www.appropedia.org/Delta_Build_Overview:MOST (accessed 15 September 2015).

NASA Atmospheric Science Data Center (2015), (accessed 15 July 2015).

NREL (1997), “Electricity when and where you need it: from the sun”, available at: www.nrel.gov/docs/gen/fy97/21732.pdf (accessed 5 October 2015).

Obydenkova, S.V. and Pearce, J.M. (2016), “Technical viability of mobile solar photovoltaic systems for indigenous nomadic communities in Northern latitudes”, Renewable Energy, Vol. 89, pp. 253-267.

Pearce, J.M. (2012), “Building research equipment with free, open-source hardware”, Science, Vol. 337 No. 6100, pp. 1303-1304.

Pearce, J.M. (2013), Open-Source Lab: How to Build Your Own Hardware and Reduce Research Costs, Elsevier, New York.

Pearce, J.M. (2015), “Applications of open source 3-D printing on small farms”, Organic Farming, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 19-35.

Pearce, J.M., Blair, C.M., Laciak, K.J., Andrews, R., Nosrat, A. and Zelenika-Zovko, I. (2010), “3-D printing of open source appropriate technologies for self-directed sustainable development”, Journal of Sustainable Development, Vol. 3 No. 4, p. 17.

Rajaram, A. and Ramanathan, N. (1982), “Tensile properties of antler bone”, Calcified Tissue International, Vol. 34 No. 3, pp. 301-305.

Ramadani, V. and Hoy, F. (2015), “Context and uniqueness of family businesses”, in Dana, L.P. and Ramadani, V. (Eds), Family Businesses in Transition Economies, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 9-37.

Rayna, T. and Striukova, L. (2016), “From rapid prototyping to home fabrication: How 3D printing is changing business model innovation”, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, Vol. 102, pp. 214-224.

Reindeer Herders’ Association (2014), available at: http://reindeerherding.org/wrh/

Reindeer Husbandry Act (1971), “Sweden”, (accessed 15 August 2015).

Reinert, E.S. (2006), “The economics of reindeer herding”, British Food Journal, Vol. 108 No. 7, pp. 522-540.

Rundle, G. (2014), A Revolution in the Making, Affirm Press, South Melbourne.

Russian National Census (2010), (accessed 15 July 2015).

Roturier, S. and Roué, M. (2009), “Of Forest, snow and lichen: Sámi reindeer herders’ knowledge of winter pastures in Northern Sweden”, Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 258 No. 9, pp. 1960-1967.

Sain Smart (2015), (accessed 28 September 2015).

Sami in Sweden (2018), available at: www.samer.se (accessed 31 August 2015).

Sami Statistics (2010), “Statistics Norway”, (accessed 31 August 2015).

Sells, E., Smith, Z., Bailard, S., Bowyer, A. and Olliver, V. (2009), “RepRap: the replicating rapid prototyper: maximizing customizability by breeding the means of production”, in Piller, F.T., Tseng, M.M. (Eds), Handbook of Research in Mass Customization and Personalization: Strategies and Concepts, World Scientific, Vol. 1, pp. 568-580.

Smith, R. (2012), “Developing and animating enterprising individuals and communities: a case study from rural Aberdeenshire, Scotland”, Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 57-83.

Solvang, W.D. and Hakam, M.H. (2010), “Sustainable logistics networks in sparsely populated areas”, Journal of Service Science and Management, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 72-77.

Statistics Norway (2015), “Sales of petroleum products”, (accessed 14 September 2015).

Tyler, N.J.C., Turi, J.M., Sundset, M.A., Strøm Bull, K., Sara, M.N., Reinert, E., Oskal, N., Nellemann, C., McCarthy, J.J., Mathiesen, S.D., Martello, M.L., Magga, O.H., Hovelsrud, G.K., Hanssen-Bauer, I., Eira, N.I., Eira, I.M.G. and Corell, R.W. (2007), “Saami reindeer pastoralism under climate change: applying a generalized framework for vulnerability studies to a Sub-arctic social-ecological system”, Global Environmental Change, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 191-206.

Tymrak, B.M., Kreiger, M. and Pearce, J.M. (2014), “Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions”, Materials & Design, Vol. 58, pp. 242-246.

Usher, E., Jean, G. and Howell, G. (1994), “The use of photovoltaics in a Northern climate”, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, Vol. 34 Nos 1/4, pp. 73-81.

Wijnen, B., Anzalone, G.C. and Pearce, J.M. (2014), “Open-source mobile water quality testing platform”, Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 532-537.

Wijnen, B., Anzalone, G.C., Haselhuhn, A.S., Sanders, P.G. and Pearce, J.M. (2016), “Free and open-source control software for 3-D motion and processing”, Journal of Open Research Software, Vol. 4 No. 1, p. e2.

Williams, C.C. (2011), “Entrepreneurship, the informal economy and rural communities”, Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 145-157.

Wittbrodt, B.T., Squires, D.A., Walbeck, J., Campbell, E., Campbell, W.H. and Pearce, J.M. (2015), “Open-source photometric system for enzymatic nitrate quantification”, PLoS One, Vol. 10 No. 8, p. e0134989.

Wittbrodt, B.T., Glover, A.G., Laureto, J., Anzalone, G.C., Oppliger, D., Irwin, J.L. and Pearce, J.M. (2013), “Life-cycle economic analysis of distributed manufacturing with open-source 3-D printers”, Mechatronics, Vol. 23 No. 6, pp. 713-726.

Wohlers, T. and Caffrey, T. (2014), “Wohlers report 2014 annual worldwide progress report”, Wohlers Associates, Inc., Fort Collins, CO.

Worley, J.W. (2015), “Fences for the farm”, UGA Extension, (accessed 18 September 2015).

Yu, H., Solvang, W.D. and Chen, C. (2014), “A green supply chain network design model for enhancing competitiveness and sustainability of companies in high North arctic regions”, International Journal of Energy and Environment, Vol. 5, pp. 403-418.

Government of Canada (2018), “Statistics Canada”, available at: www.statcan.gc.ca/ (accessed 15 July 2015).

UN Educational, Scientiﬁc and Cultural Organization and UNESCO Institute of Information Technologies in Education Climate Change Adaptation (2018), “Traditional knowledge of indigenous peoples inhabiting the Arctic and Far North”, (accessed July 12 January 2017).

## Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate invaluable information on the details of reindeer husbandry provided by community representatives of Ust-Nukzha village, Russia, and reindeer herders Vladimir A. Nickolaev and Galina S. Nickolaeva in particular.

This paper forms part of a special section “Entrepreneurial co-creation: a call for fresh ideas and innovative”, guest edited by Hans Kaufmann and S.M. Riad Shams.

## Corresponding author

Svetlana Obydenkova can be contacted at: soby@kth.se