To read this content please select one of the options below:

Heritage theory at work: how heritage policy in Toronto, Canada shapes a market with asymmetrical opportunities for professionals and tradespeople

Luke McElcheran (Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada)
Mario Santana Quintero (Faculty of Engineering and Design, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada)

Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development

ISSN: 2044-1266

Article publication date: 10 May 2022

Issue publication date: 18 June 2024

109

Abstract

Purpose

Toronto's heritage program is reporting year over year growth in both the number of listed and designated properties and the amount of money secured for heritage projects. At the same time, it is widely recognized that heritage trade skills are in decline. The purpose of this research is to examine Toronto's heritage policy in its regulatory and economic context to understand why heritage trades are struggling while the heritage program and the market for heritage professional services flourish and to suggest solutions based on existing policy tools.

Design/methodology/approach

This research looks at the policy documents at the federal, provincial and municipal level that determine the minimum standard for heritage conservation in Toronto. It refers to secondary research on the economic context for these regulations to understand how they are applied and why they tend to produce certain outcomes. It introduces the regulatory context set by Canada's Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places and the Ontario Heritage Act. It goes on to analyse Toronto's local policy in more detail including density bonusing programs, the Toronto Official Plan and Heritage Conservation District planning standards.

Findings

Toronto's heritage policy creates asymmetrical opportunities for heritage professionals and heritage specializing tradespeople. While the work that heritage professionals do is required or strongly encouraged by policy and increases reliably with the amount of funding secured for heritage projects, heritage tradespeople do not enjoy similar advantages. Their work is not required in the same way as heritage professionals' or encouraged to the same degree, and money secured for heritage projects does not necessarily go towards work that would engage the building trades necessary to maintain heritage structures.

Originality/value

The value of job creation in heritage trades is a mainstay of heritage economic advocacy, and there is growing interest in the value of these trades skills as a resource for sustainable building practices. There is relatively little research considering how heritage policy and theory affect career opportunities for workers with these trades skills, and none that addresses those systemic pressures in the context of municipal heritage programs in Canada.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This research was supported with funding from the NSERC CREATE Heritage Engineering Program and the Azrieli School of Architecture at Carleton University. The authors owe a debt of gratitude to the working tradespeople and professionals encountered through the NSERC Create program who shaped the direction of the research.

Citation

McElcheran, L. and Santana Quintero, M. (2024), "Heritage theory at work: how heritage policy in Toronto, Canada shapes a market with asymmetrical opportunities for professionals and tradespeople", Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 600-613. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-09-2021-0169

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles