To read this content please select one of the options below:

A third dimension to understanding voluntary disclosures

John Ben Prince (Based at the Strategic Management Group, Indian Institute of Management, Lucknow, India)
Neeraj Dwivedi (Based at the Strategic Management Group, Indian Institute of Management, Lucknow, India)

Journal of Business Strategy

ISSN: 0275-6668

Article publication date: 12 July 2013

972

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to establish sufficient potential for a novel perspective that could enhance understanding of the rationale behind voluntary disclosures. In this paper, the authors seek to provide an integrated view from different disciplines that points to a new dimension. This dimension is expected to promote a better understanding of voluntary disclosures in corporate governance.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors use the conceptual underpinnings of agency theory and integrate several perspectives from different disciplines. Through the support of simple matrices and a conceptual figure, an interesting finding is proposed that could help provide a new way of looking at voluntary disclosures.

Findings

The established view holds that due to information asymmetry between the shareholders and the management, voluntary disclosures are more meaningful for the shareholders of the firm. The authors, however, suggest that since information asymmetry is already embedded in several roles and strategic actions of the board, it leads to the development of a third dimension in understanding voluntary disclosures.

Originality/value

Information asymmetry has been well understood as one of the key aspects of the agency theory. The authors' strive to apply this phenomenon while looking at the roles of the board and the strategic actions that result therein. The result is an enhanced understanding of the motivations behind voluntary disclosures.

Keywords

Citation

Ben Prince, J. and Dwivedi, N. (2013), "A third dimension to understanding voluntary disclosures", Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 48-54. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-11-2012-0063

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2013, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles