To read this content please select one of the options below:

Accelerated temperature and voltage life tests on aluminium electrolytic capacitors: A DOE approach

V.N.A. Naikan (Reliability Engineering Centre, Indian Institution of Technology, Kharagpur, India)
Arvind Rathore (Reliability Engineering Centre, Indian Institution of Technology, Kharagpur, India)

International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management

ISSN: 0265-671X

Article publication date: 31 December 2015

478

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to focus on conducting accelerated life tests on aluminium electrolytic capacitors under accelerated temperature and voltage stress to study the effect of applied voltage and ambient temperature on the capacitor, its degradation over time, failure data collection, analysis and then modelling the failure times. Principles of DOE are used for studying the effect of temperature and voltage.

Design/methodology/approach

Life tests are conducted at three levels of temperature and applied voltage and the life of capacitor is ascertained at each treatment level. Life variation with voltage and temperature is studied to gain an insight as to how these factors affect the lifetime of the capacitor. The interaction effect of temperature and voltage on capacitor life is also established.

Findings

The life of the capacitor decreases exponentially with temperature and voltage at all the three factor levels. Ambient temperature, applied voltage and their interaction effect significantly affects the life of the capacitor. Applied voltage has the greatest effect followed by ambient temperature and then their interaction effect. Life of the capacitor has been estimated as 4,206 hrs when only voltage is taken as the accelerated stress using Inverse Power Law and as 4,003 hrs when both temperature and voltage are taken as accelerating stress using combination model.

Research limitations/implications

This work consider only decrease in capacitance as the failure criterion. However, as a future scope, it is proposed that test may be conducted by taking into consideration not only the decrease in capacitance as the failure criteria but by monitoring all the performance parameters of the capacitor. This would give a more realistic assessment of life as it is possible that capacitor may have failed much before it reached the lower threshold capacitance value.

Practical implications

This work has lots of practical implications. It shows how DOE approach can be used for ALT data analysis and identification and effect of critical stresses acting on capacitors in real practice. Most critical types of stresses affecting the reliability can thus be controlled to ensure better performance. Product manufactures as well as users will be benefited by such findings. The paper has also illustrated how failure data can generated by degradation analysis using life test data collection at discrete intervals.

Originality/value

The methodology presents an alternative non traditional approach of accelerated life testing, which does not require continuous monitoring of test items. This only requires intermittent monitoring which reduces the need of test resources. Though the degradation study itself is not new but using degradation study for ALT data generation is new. This approach may considerably reduce the test duration and resources used for ALT. DOE approach gives more tangible result to study the effect of various variables on the dependent variable. As DOE approach uses a fractional factorial design, it can be very helpful to conduct life tests with minimum number of test units (only a fraction of full factorial test units). This will considerably reduce the test duration, resources requirement for testing, easier but accurate data analysis, and faster product development, especially when ALT is to be conducted at several stresses simultaneously.

Keywords

Citation

Naikan, V.N.A. and Rathore, A. (2015), "Accelerated temperature and voltage life tests on aluminium electrolytic capacitors: A DOE approach", International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 120-139. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-12-2014-0201

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles