To read this content please select one of the options below:

When suppliers engage in sustainable supply chain management: how does the stock market react?

Jason X. Wang (Department of Logistics, Marketing, Hospitality, and Analytics, University of Huddersfield Business School, Huddersfield, UK)
Tsan-Ming Choi (School of Management, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK) (College of Management, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan)
Lincoln C. Wood (Department of Management, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand) (Logistics Research Cluster, Curtin University, Perth, Australia)
Karin Olesen (Graduate School of Management, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand)
Torsten Reiners (Logistics Research Cluster, Curtin University, Perth, Australia)

International Journal of Operations & Production Management

ISSN: 0144-3577

Article publication date: 6 September 2023

Issue publication date: 15 February 2024

505

Abstract

Purpose

Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM), driven by the downstream buyers' power, transfers sustainability responsibilities to the upstream supplier. In contrast to the heavily-focused buyers' perspective in the literature, the authors investigate how this buyer-driven SSCM influences suppliers' performance, using the measure of stock market reaction.

Design/methodology/approach

Grounded by the resource dependence theory (RDT), the authors empirically analyze the power effect on suppliers. Event study methodology and regression analysis are used, based on a sample of 1977 paired supplier observations from 1990 to 2016.

Findings

The result suggests that although a negative stock market reaction for suppliers in SSCM exists, the effect is less negative at a high level of buyer and supplier dependence. For the investigation of the “consolidated SSCM initiative,” where buyers acquire exogenous power by collaboratively managing SSCM with their peers, the authors uncover that the negative impact of this consolidated SSCM initiative can be mitigated by the high interdependence that generates relational norms in the dyads.

Research limitations/implications

The authors focus on dyadic relationships. Future research can use the study's findings to study the SSCM diffusion to lower-tier suppliers.

Practical implications

This paper has good managerial implications for both suppliers and buyers. The authors propose dependence-based strategies for supplier managers to reduce uncertainty in SSCM. Moreover, buyer managers can use the study's findings to strengthen suppliers' commitment.

Originality/value

The novelty of examining the suppliers' perspective contributes to exploring the supply chain impact of SSCM. The authors extend RDT and show that high dependence is not necessarily detrimental to suppliers in this buyer-driven SSCM context. The interesting finding of interdependence in the context of the consolidated SSCM initiative brings new insights that relational norms constrain the leverage of power in the dyads and are beneficial to the power-disadvantageous suppliers.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Prof. Vinod Singhal for providing valuable feedback on earlier drafts.

Citation

Wang, J.X., Choi, T.-M., Wood, L.C., Olesen, K. and Reiners, T. (2024), "When suppliers engage in sustainable supply chain management: how does the stock market react?", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 44 No. 3, pp. 699-727. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-01-2023-0001

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles