Do ISO standards favour logistics provider efficiency, competitiveness and sustainability? A Slovenian perspective

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the prevalence of the application of standards and their positive influence on the efficiency and competitiveness of Slovenian logistics service providers. Moreover, an analysis was also done on the relationship between the adoption of the environmental standard and greater concern for the environment.

Design/methodology/approach

A small sample analysis was done using a combination of statistical methods and an abductive approach. A χ2 analysis was utilized to test the hypotheses.

Findings

Many benefits were indicated. However, a positive relationship between quality standards and efficiency, as well as competitiveness, was not confirmed. In addition, the implementation of ISO 14001 quality standards was found to have no effect on the higher investment in environmental protection.

Research limitations/implications

This study is limited by its local aspect (Slovenia), small sample size and its focus on just quality standards and their external factors. Future studies should be extended to the countries of eastern Europe and should further examine the relationship of internal factors as well as the relationship between the adoption of quality standards and the supply chain.

Practical implications

A survey is essential not just for the Slovenian industry but also for the wider logistics industry as well as for government authorities and standards providers.

Originality/value

This is one of the first papers written to analyse the effects of quality standards on international logistics service providers and the first paper that has explored the impact of standards on Slovenian logistics service providers.

Citation

Bajec, P., Tuljak-Suban, D. and Krmac, E. (2015), "Do ISO standards favour logistics provider efficiency, competitiveness and sustainability? A Slovenian perspective", The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 275-295. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-01-2013-0006