Is there really any difference between lesson and learning study? Both focus on neriage

Keith Wood (Institute of Education, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam)

International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies

ISSN: 2046-8253

Publication date: 10 April 2017

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to highlight similarities between Japanese lesson study, Chinese lesson study and learning study.

Design/methodology/approach

This editorial review is intended to stimulate a discussion about a critical aspect of both Lesson and learning studies exemplified by the texts published in issue 6.2 of this journal.

Findings

The author identifies neriage, the comparison and discussion phase of Japanese lesson study, as a critical aspect of both Lesson and learning studies and emphasises that both involve research leading to teachers learning what makes effective lessons possible. Attention is drawn to the importance of being explicit about the theory of learning behind Lesson and learning studies and how its implementation leads to teacher learning.

Originality/value

This editorial review provides a framework for evaluating the quality of lesson and learning studies in educational institutions.

Keywords

Citation

Keith Wood (2017) "Is there really any difference between lesson and learning study? Both focus on neriage", International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 118-123

Download as .RIS

DOI

: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-02-2017-0008

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2017, Emerald Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.