To read this content please select one of the options below:

2024 practice analysis: a comparison of expectations vs actual performance of essential competencies in public relations

Marlene S. Neill (Department of Journalism, Public Relations and New Media, Baylor University College of Arts and Sciences, Waco, Texas, USA)
Lauren Combs (Department of Journalism, Public Relations and New Media, Baylor University College of Arts and Sciences, Waco, Texas, USA)
Raphael Roker (Department of Journalism, Public Relations and New Media, Baylor University College of Arts and Sciences, Waco, Texas, USA)
Emeri Drewry (Department of Journalism, Public Relations and New Media, Baylor University College of Arts and Sciences, Waco, Texas, USA)
Lia Hood (Department of Journalism, Public Relations and New Media, Baylor University College of Arts and Sciences, Waco, Texas, USA)
Mallory Vaughan (Department of Journalism, Public Relations and New Media, Baylor University College of Arts and Sciences, Waco, Texas, USA)
Aliyah Binford (Department of Journalism, Public Relations and New Media, Baylor University College of Arts and Sciences, Waco, Texas, USA)
McKenna Joyce (Department of Journalism, Public Relations and New Media, Baylor University College of Arts and Sciences, Waco, Texas, USA)

Corporate Communications: An International Journal

ISSN: 1356-3289

Article publication date: 17 September 2024

130

Abstract

Purpose

We conducted the Universal Accreditation Board (UAB) practice analysis to examine perceptions of US public relations practitioners and educators regarding the essential competencies for entry-level and mid-career professionals. This is a trend analysis survey that is conducted every five years to assess changes in required competencies.

Design/methodology/approach

The survey was distributed via email to organizations affiliated with the UAB. Two variations of the survey were available to differentiate between practitioners and educators. The study was conducted from February through March of 2024.

Findings

We found practitioners’ expectations for others exceeded their own actual performance levels. This may be attributed to social comparison bias. We have provided recommendations for updating the Accreditation in Public Relations (APR) and certificate exams based on our findings. For example, we recommend senior professionals adopt a nurturing leadership style when mentoring young professionals. The study also revealed that educators overestimated generative artificial intelligence (AI) use in the workplace, as practitioners exhibited a slower rate of adoption of AI. The literature and theories that guided the paper were AI use, the history of accreditation in public relations and the diffusion of innovation theory.

Originality/value

This research paper provides insights related to the diffusion of AI competencies in the workplace. Additionally, this research adds to public relations literature by revealing the gap in expectations of senior professionals for beginning and mid-career professionals and their own job performance.

Keywords

Citation

Neill, M.S., Combs, L., Roker, R., Drewry, E., Hood, L., Vaughan, M., Binford, A. and Joyce, M. (2024), "2024 practice analysis: a comparison of expectations vs actual performance of essential competencies in public relations", Corporate Communications: An International Journal, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-04-2024-0066

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles