Hotel branding and COVID-19 managed isolation and quarantine (MIQ) facilities: consequences and lessons learnt

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to understand the consequences of the decision by some hotels during the COVID-19 pandemic to contract their accommodation to be used as managed isolation and quarantine (MIQ) facilities. Specifically, this study aims to understand the impact of this decision in terms of corporate brand image, brand loyalty, negative word of mouth (NWOM) and purchase intention.

Design/methodology/approach

Data were collected through a quasi-experimental research design and was analysed through a t-test.

Findings

This study hypothesises that the use of a hotel brand as a COVID-19 MIQ facility will be detrimental to its corporate brand image because of the expectation disconfirmation theory and attribution theory, thus reducing brand loyalty and increasing NWOM. The result supports the hypotheses.

Research limitations/implications

This study does not factor in a time period for the observed effects. While the results indicate that hotels used for MIQ purposes have reduced corporate brand image, brand loyalty and purchase intention, this study does not establish the duration of the damage.

Originality/value

This study provides insight into consumers' perceptions of hotel brands that served as COVID-19 MIQ facilities. The originality lies in the discovery that the decision by hoteliers to opt to use their facilities for COVID-19 MIQ facilities was detrimental to corporate brand image and brand loyalty.

Citation

Wisker, Z.L. and Morgan, Z. (2023), "Hotel branding and COVID-19 managed isolation and quarantine (MIQ) facilities: consequences and lessons learnt", Consumer Behavior in Tourism and Hospitality, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 256-268. https://doi.org/10.1108/CBTH-03-2022-0078