To read this content please select one of the options below:

The Two Sides of the Title Retention Clauses: The Caterpillar Case

Professor Akhileshwar Pathak (Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad)

Publication date: 2 December 2019

Abstract

Contracts term of commercial sale of goods have a ‘title retention clause’, preventing the transfer of ownership till the seller is fully paid. The unpaid seller gets the right to repossess the goods from the buyer. Exigencies of businesses have led to introduction of further clauses allowing the buyer to use or sub-sell the goods even before the transfer of ownership. The United Kingdom Court of Appeal judgment in the Caterpillar Case brings out the effects of the contradictions of a title retention clause qualified by the right of the buyer to use or sub-sell.

Keywords

Citation

Pathak, A. (2019), "The Two Sides of the Title Retention Clauses: The Caterpillar Case", . https://doi.org/10.1108/CASE.IIMA.2020.000197

Publisher

:

Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad

Copyright © 2019 by the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad

Related articles