Hydroponic cultivation: life cycle assessment of substrate choice

Abstract

Purpose

Nowadays, hydroponic cultivation represents a widely used agricultural methodology. The purpose of this paper is to study comparatively on hydroponic substrates. This study is highlighting the best substrate to be involved in hydroponic systems, considering its costs and its sustainability.

Design/methodology/approach

Seven substrates were evaluated: rock wool, perlite, vermiculite, peat, coconut fibres, bark and sand. Life cycle assessment (life cycle inventory, life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) and life cycle costing (LCC)) was applied to evaluate the environmental and economic impact. Through the results of the impacts, the carbon footprint of each substrate was calculated.

Findings

Perlite is the most impacting substrate, as highlighted by LCIA, followed by rock wool and vermiculite. The most sustainable ones, instead, are sand and bark. Sand has the lower carbon footprint (0.0121 kg CO₂ eq.); instead, bark carbon footprint results in one of the highest (1.1197 kg CO₂ eq.), while in the total impact analysis this substrate seems to be highly sustainable. Also for perlite the two results are in disagreement: it has a high total impact but very low carbon footprint (0.0209 kg CO₂ eq.) compared to the other substrates. From the LCC analysis it appears that peat is the most expensive substrate (€6.67/1,000 cm³), while sand is the cheaper one (€0.26/1,000 cm³).

Originality/value

The LCA and carbon footprint methodologies were applied to a growing agriculture practice. This study has highlighted the economic and environmental sustainability of seven substrates examined. This analysis has shown that sand can be the best substrate to be involved in hydroponic systems by considering its costs and its sustainability.

Citation

Vinci, G. and Rapa, M. (2019), "Hydroponic cultivation: life cycle assessment of substrate choice", British Food Journal, Vol. 121 No. 8, pp. 1801-1812. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-02-2019-0112