To read this content please select one of the options below:

The location of comprehensive income reporting – does it pass the financial analyst revision test?

Louis Banks (UQ Business School, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia and Investment Banking Division, Credit Suisse Australia, Sydney, Australia)
Allan Hodgson (Faculty of Business Economics and Law, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia)
Mark Russell (UQ Business School, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia)

Accounting Research Journal

ISSN: 1030-9616

Article publication date: 5 November 2018

683

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to test whether a change in the reporting location of income, and other comprehensive income (OCI) components, in a statement of comprehensive income (SoCI) under International Financial Reporting Standards affects their value-relevance and use by financial analysts.

Design/methodology/approach

The study tests the associations between CI, OCI, share returns and financial analyst forecast revisions.

Findings

Results show that comprehensive income is less value-relevant than net income, regardless of reporting location. Changing the reporting location of OCI components to the SoCI does not provide incremental improvement for financial analysts or stock prices. Finally, the paper finds that analysts use OCI components to revise forecasts.

Originality/value

The paper addresses the question of which OCI components should be reported, and the importance of reporting location. The paper extends the examination of OCI components to financial analysts as expert financial report users.

Keywords

Citation

Banks, L., Hodgson, A. and Russell, M. (2018), "The location of comprehensive income reporting – does it pass the financial analyst revision test?", Accounting Research Journal, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 531-550. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-04-2017-0075

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles