To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below:

Counter accounts of profit: outrage to action through “just” calculation

Darlene Himick (Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada)
Kate Ruff (Sprott School of Business, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada)

Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal

ISSN: 0951-3574

Article publication date: 11 July 2019

Issue publication date: 15 May 2020

Abstract

Purpose

Profit is often moralized by activists, but scant research has carefully examined what profit is for these activists or how they use it to create a more just world. The purpose of this paper is to investigate how social movements use counter accounts of profit as tools of resistance.

Design/methodology/approach

A multiple case study design, informed by framing theory, is used to trace the framing of profit from activists’ counter accounts to actions they precipitated. Specifically, the study examines counter accounts of profit from the UK abolition movement, Médecines Sans Frontières access to essential medicines campaign and Brigitte Bardot Foundation’s opposition to the Canadian seal hunt, and how their framings of profit influenced change.

Findings

Activists reframe profit to create visibilities and bridges to the suffering of distant others. Reframing the calculation and boundary of profit is a strategy to elicit moral outrage, hope and ultimately a more just world. Through these reframings, activists in three different social movements were able to change the possibilities of who and what can be profitable, and how.

Social implications

The inherently incomplete nature of accounting frames give rise to accounting’s vulnerability to non-accountants to assert their views of a moral profit. Accounting therefore is both a means of control at a distance but also “emancipation at a distance.”

Originality/value

Scholars have asserted that accounting can be used for resistance, few studies have examined how. By examining how activists assert what profit is – and should be – the paper documents and theorizes profit as contested and highlights accounting’s emancipatory potential.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This paper forms part of a special section “Problematizing profit and profitability”, guest edited by Alan Lowe, Yesh Nama and Alexandru Preda.

Citation

Himick, D. and Ruff, K. (2020), "Counter accounts of profit: outrage to action through “just” calculation", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 33 No. 4, pp. 699-726. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2018-3432

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited