To read this content please select one of the options below:

Heritage reporting by the Australian public sector: Possibilities from the concepts of new public governance

Peir Peir Woon (School of Accounting and Finance, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, Australia)
Bikram Chatterjee (Department of Accounting, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia)
Carolyn J. Cordery (Aston Business School, Aston University, Birmingham, UK)

Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal

ISSN: 0951-3574

Article publication date: 1 May 2019

Issue publication date: 28 May 2019

995

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the future development of heritage reporting in Australia. Public sector reporting of heritage has been a long-standing issue, due to shortcomings in (sector-neutral) for-profit-based financial reporting standards. Australia’s sector-neutral approach does not meet public sector users’ information needs. The authors develop a heritage reporting model to balance community and other stakeholders’ interests and address prior critiques.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper reviews heritage reporting requirements in Anglo-Western Countries, and analyses commentaries and research publications. It evaluates the existing reporting requirements in the context of new public management (which focusses on information and efficiency) and new public governance (NPG) (focussing on balancing interests and quality).

Findings

The paper proposes an NPG-based heritage reporting model which includes indicators of performance on the five UNESCO (1972) dimensions and operational guidelines issued by UNESCO (2015). These are identification, presentation, protection, conservation and transmission. The proposed model is consistent with the notion of US SFFAS 29 (the standard for Federal entities). Not all heritage must be capitalised and hence attachment of monetary value, but detailed disclosures are necessary.

Research limitations/implications

The authors expect the proposed heritage reporting model to better serve users of heritage information compared to the present Australian Accounting Standards Board 116: Property, Plant and Equipment.

Originality/value

The authors’ proposed model of heritage reporting attempts to answer Carnegie and Wolnizer’s (1995, 1999) six questions, addresses decades of concerns raised in previous literature and provides a new perspective to heritage reporting based on NPG that should better serve users’ needs.

Keywords

Citation

Woon, P.P., Chatterjee, B. and Cordery, C.J. (2019), "Heritage reporting by the Australian public sector: Possibilities from the concepts of new public governance", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 612-631. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2015-2008

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles