To read this content please select one of the options below:

Practices of robust design methodology in practice

Ida Gremyr (Division of Quality Sciences, Department of Technology Management and Economics, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden)
Torben Hasenkamp (Department of Process Excellence, Vestas Nacelles Deutschland, Lübeck, Germany)

The TQM Journal

ISSN: 1754-2731

Article publication date: 11 January 2011

1329

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether a design of experiments application in a company that works with robust design management (RDM) reflects the principles and practices of RDM.

Design/methodology/approach

The findings of this paper are based on an empirical study of a medium‐sized Swedish enterprise that develops and manufactures consumer products for domestic use and actively uses RDM. The study is comprised of an analysis of internal company documents, semi‐structured interviews and e‐mail correspondence.

Findings

The study reveals a gap between principles and tool use; a feasible tool is applied but in a suboptimal mode with a low contribution in terms of increased robustness. This gap could be bridged by practices that describe, on an activity‐based level, what needs to be done in order to fulfil the principles.

Originality/value

The results of this case explain the difficulties that companies face when trying to introduce RDM. It also provides insights into RDM implementation work at the company in question.

Keywords

Citation

Gremyr, I. and Hasenkamp, T. (2011), "Practices of robust design methodology in practice", The TQM Journal, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542731111097489

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2011, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles