Sorting out evaluation of learning and development: making it easier for ourselves

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to expose the errors of existing common evaluation frameworks such as Kirkpatrick and to suggest superior approaches.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper is based on work done in a variety of organizations as well as existing research evidence.

Findings

The paper finds that evaluation of learning and development can be both more rigorous and simpler.

Practical implications

The paper has real practical implications for leaders/managers and learning and development professionals, as it shows how to overcome the limitations of existing approaches to evaluation. By proposing an alternative approach to Kirkpatrick's model it encourages practitioners to be clearer about evaluation activity.

Originality/value

The paper will be of value to managers and learning specialists as it raises important issues about how to evaluate learning and development activity.

Citation

Cunningham, I. (2007), "Sorting out evaluation of learning and development: making it easier for ourselves", Development and Learning in Organizations, Vol. 21 No. 5, pp. 4-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777280710779409