To read this content please select one of the options below:

Graduated response and the emergence of a European surveillance society

Trisha Meyer (Doctoral researcher at the Institute for European Studies, Brussels, Belgium and is affiliated with the Center for Studies on Media, Information and Telecommunication (IBBT‐SMIT), Brussels, Belgium)
Leo Van Audenhove (Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium and Center for Studies on Media, Information and Telecommunication (IBBT‐SMIT), Brussels, Belgium)

info

ISSN: 1463-6697

Article publication date: 28 September 2010

775

Abstract

Purpose

This paper seeks to offer an alternative critique to graduated response, a warning and sanction mechanism aimed at fighting online piracy.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper reflects on and frames graduated response in terms of theories on surveillance society and code. In particular, it analyses the graduated response debate in the European Union and the current initiatives in France and the UK.

Findings

The paper argues that graduated response portrays rights holders as being in a state of emergency, is a form of social sorting, and has a technological bias.

Originality/value

This paper contends that many objections raised to graduated response have been reduced to issues concerning the procedure rather than the principle, and that important societal questions concerning graduated response remain un(der)explored.

Keywords

Citation

Meyer, T. and Van Audenhove, L. (2010), "Graduated response and the emergence of a European surveillance society", info, Vol. 12 No. 6, pp. 69-79. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636691011086053

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2010, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles