To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below:

Understanding and resolving the global problematique: assessing the balance between progressive and socially conservative foresight

Richard Slaughter (Director, Foresight International, Indooroopilly, Queensland, Australia )
Chris Riedy (Research Director at the Institute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia)

Foresight

ISSN: 1463-6689

Article publication date: 28 August 2009

Abstract

Purpose

This paper draws on research undertaken for the State of Play in the Futures Field (SoPiFF) project and aims to explore the contribution of futures work to understanding and resolving aspects of the global problematique and to examine the social interests evident in futures work.

Design/methodology/approach

The project used an integral meta‐scanning framework to review publicly available futures material. The framework categorizes futures work according to organizational type, social interests, methods, domains and geographic location (details of the methodology are outlined in the accompanying introductory paper as well as on the web site created for the project).

Findings

The futures field has made a series of significant contributions to understanding the global problematique and has contributed to the pre‐conditions for its resolution. However, the bulk of mainstream futures work does little to improve the preparedness of humanity for looming future crises. More innovative futures work remains marginalized and largely ignored by the powerful and the wider public. There is a strong case for more effective political engagement than has occurred hitherto.

Research limitations/implications

Further research is needed on shared definitions for the field, interactions with the media, public and other fields of enquiry and action, measurement of individual foresight capacity, strategies for achieving influence – particularly in the political sphere, the role of subcultures within the futures field and suitable publishing strategies.

Practical implications

The paper recommends specific actions to promote and publicize good work, provide annual digests of futures‐related information, develop and use focused briefings, provide support for “cutting‐edge” futures work, further develop advanced futures methods, create new alliances, build the social capacity for foresight and strengthen the nexus between foresight and philanthropy.

Originality/value

The paper uses an integral meta‐scanning framework to provide a novel analysis of the futures field. The findings will be of value to all futures and foresight practitioners that are interested in the future success of the field.

Keywords

Citation

Slaughter, R. and Riedy, C. (2009), "Understanding and resolving the global problematique: assessing the balance between progressive and socially conservative foresight", Foresight, Vol. 11 No. 5, pp. 21-39. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680910994941

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2009, Company