Dumbing down performance measures

Paul Walsh (Paul Walsh is Senior Lecturer at the Australian Graduate School of Management, University of NSW, Sydney, Australia.)

Measuring Business Excellence

ISSN: 1368-3047

Publication date: 1 December 2005

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to examine why and how firms adopt less‐than‐perfect surrogate measures and, in extreme cases, dumb down measures to support strategic scorecards.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper presents a taxonomy to classify the different types of surrogate measures and workarounds are suggested for evaluating performance when surrogate measures are present.

Findings

The use of low investment surrogate measures is tempting when firms face the prospect of measuring strategic objectives, especially around intangible assets. Current approaches tend to be ad hoc and would benefit from being more systematic.

Practical implications

The approach enables firms to recognise the potential for dumb measures, suggest workarounds and improve current practice for managing with less relevant measures.

Originality/value

The taxonomy and workarounds presented provide greater rigour, insight and legitimacy to the use of surrogate measures in scorecards.

Keywords

Citation

Walsh, P. (2005), "Dumbing down performance measures", Measuring Business Excellence, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683040510634826

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2005, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.