To read this content please select one of the options below:

Workplace learning in the New Zealand apple industry network: A new co‐design method for government “practice making”

Roberta Hill (WEB Research, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand)
Phillip Capper (WEB Research, Wellington, New Zealand)
Ken Wilson (WEB Research, Wellington, New Zealand)
Richard Whatman (NZ Department of Labour, Wellington, New Zealand)
Karen Wong (NZ Department of Labour, Wellington, New Zealand)

Journal of Workplace Learning

ISSN: 1366-5626

Article publication date: 14 August 2007

1523

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to describe how, from 2004‐2006, a New Zealand research team experimented with the “change laboratory” learning process to create a new method of government policy development and implementation, referred to as “practice‐making”. The apple industry in Hawke's Bay was chosen because of the level of tension among government agencies and small/medium‐sized firms in the industry, particularly around the scarcity of seasonal labour, amid growing concerns about the possible collapse of the industry.

Design/methodology/approach

The team stimulated a cycle of expansive learning among the network of activity systems in the industry. Laboratory participants were growers, labour contractors, pack house operators, quality controllers, horticultural consultants and government officials. The expansive learning cycle is a core concept in developmental work research (DWR) and cultural‐historical activity theory (CHAT).

Findings

Participants created a shared “object” for apple production and its government policy and regulation built around quality, making a substantive shift from adaptive learning to transformational learning, and creating a major redesign of the industry. Many of the new practices are now being implemented in the industry and government.

Practical implications

The CHAT/DWR approach seems particularly well suited for complex problem solving in any network where there are intractable systems contradictions and a strong desire among participants to make real change.

Originality/value

It is understood that this is the first time a change laboratory process has been used for government “practice‐making” with industry, in contrast with traditional policy development and implementation that frequently does not address systemic problems.

Keywords

Citation

Hill, R., Capper, P., Wilson, K., Whatman, R. and Wong, K. (2007), "Workplace learning in the New Zealand apple industry network: A new co‐design method for government “practice making”", Journal of Workplace Learning, Vol. 19 No. 6, pp. 359-376. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620710777101

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2007, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles