An antagonistic dialogue about chaordic systems thinking: part II

Toni Wäfler (University of Applied Sciences Solothurn, Nordwestern Switzerland, Olten, Switzerland)

The Learning Organization

ISSN: 0969-6474

Publication date: 1 December 2004

Abstract

This paper is a continuation of the antagonistic dialogue about the differences of chaordic systems thinking (CST) and socio‐technical systems design (STS). In this second part of the conversation a concrete example is used to illustrate the added value provided by CST. Whereas STS focuses on an organization's surface by designing processes and structures, CST aims at a developed mind and hence at the capability to reflect and understand. It is assumed that consciousness is the basis for the emergence of real organizational novelty, and thus, a prerequisite for viability.

Keywords

Citation

Wäfler, T. (2004), "An antagonistic dialogue about chaordic systems thinking: part II", The Learning Organization, Vol. 11 No. 6, pp. 458-465. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470410548818

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2004, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.