Quality standards and the reflective tutor
Abstract
Discusses various definitions of quality and standards used within the college and university sector and highlights their advantages and disadvantages. Looks particularly at their implications for reflective practice. Argues that the various definitions of quality have implications for the ways in which professionalism is defined, and that some definitions may be inimical to the values encapsulated in the “reflective practitioner” model.
Keywords
Citation
Ashcroft, K. and Foreman‐Peck, L. (1996), "Quality standards and the reflective tutor", Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 17-25. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684889610146154
Publisher
:MCB UP Ltd
Copyright © 1996, MCB UP Limited