HEdPERF versus SERVPERF

Firdaus Abdullah (MARA University of Technology, Selangor, Malaysia)

Quality Assurance in Education

ISSN: 0968-4883

Publication date: 1 December 2005

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to empirically test a new industry‐specific scale, HEdPERF (Higher Education PERFormance) to capture the authentic determinants of service quality within higher education sector.

Design/methodology/approach

The primary goal of this research was to test and compare the relative efficacy of HEdPERF against SERVPERF in order to determine which instrument had the superior measuring capability.

Findings

In terms of unidimensionality, reliability, and validity, HEdPERF explained variance within the higher education setting better in comparison to SERVPERF.

Research limitations/implications

Since this study only examined the respective utilities of each instrument within a single industry, in only one national setting, any suggestion that the HEdPERF is generally superior would still be premature.

Practical implications

The current findings do provide some important insights into how the instruments of service quality compare with one another, in a typical higher education context.

Originality/value

An attempt is made in the paper, to develop critical insights into comparative evaluation of service quality measurement instruments.

Keywords

Citation

Abdullah, F. (2005), "HEdPERF versus SERVPERF", Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 305-328. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880510626584

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2005, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.