To read this content please select one of the options below:

Successful school principalship in small schools

John Ewington (Leadership for Learning Research Group, Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia)
Bill Mulford (Leadership for Learning Research Group, Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia)
Diana Kendall (Leadership for Learning Research Group, Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia)
Bill Edmunds (Leadership for Learning Research Group, Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia)
Lawrie Kendall (Leadership for Learning Research Group, Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia)
Halia Silins (Leadership for Learning Research Group, Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia)

Journal of Educational Administration

ISSN: 0957-8234

Article publication date: 15 August 2008

2639

Abstract

Purpose

The special characteristics of small schools appear to set them apart from larger schools. In fact, small schools may be a discrete group in that their complexity may not be in direct ratio to their size. The special characteristics of small schools may include the absence of senior staff, administrative assistance on a part time basis only, conservatism and role conflict within the community, and lack of professional interaction. This paper aims to explore these issues by analysing data from a recent survey on Tasmania successful school principalship.

Design/methodology/approach

Results from a survey with the population of Tasmanian principals in schools of 200 or less students are compared with previous research findings from the limited literature in the area.

Findings

The study has confirmed that contextual demands result in role conflict for teaching principals, that principals of small rural schools are mobile, staying for short periods of time, and that a higher proportion are female. Statistically significant differences were found among small rural schools of 100 or fewer students and small rural and urban schools of between 101 and 200 students. These differences were best explained by combination of the “double load phenomenon” and the increasingly mandated requirements for the implementation of growing amounts of Department of Education policy, rather than rurality or socio‐economic status.

Practical implications

Given the combination of the expected large turnover in the principalship in Australian schools over the next five to ten years, the high proportion of small schools (at least one‐quarter) and the unlikely change to the traditional career path wherein, for many, becoming a principal of a small school is the initial step progressively moving to large schools, the findings add weight to the need for greater attention to be paid to small school principalship.

Originality/value

The study adds to the very limited research into successful school principalship in small schools.

Keywords

Citation

Ewington, J., Mulford, B., Kendall, D., Edmunds, B., Kendall, L. and Silins, H. (2008), "Successful school principalship in small schools", Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 46 No. 5, pp. 545-561. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230810895483

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2008, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles