When ICT meets schools: differentiation, complexity and adaptability

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to explore the interaction between information communication technology (ICT) and the school's organizational structure, and propose an analytical model based both on Luhmann's system theory and empirical findings.

Design/methodology/approach

The approach of building a theory from a case study research along with an instrumental multi‐case study method were applied to analyzing nine Israeli schools that successfully implemented ICT‐based pedagogical innovation.

Findings

The findings suggest that ICT generates three kinds of differentiation within the school's structure: segmentation, stratification and functional differentiation. The type of differentiation correlates with the school's communication and set of contingencies which includes ICT usage types, leadership style, time and space arrangement, source of expertise, and the champions – those who bear the burden. All the differentiation types were found to increase internal complexity and enhance school adaptability, and in a recursive process, affect school communication and its sensitivity toward further ICT integration.

Research limitations/ implications

The fact that the chosen schools demonstrated extreme cases of successful ICT integration might limit the generalizability of the findings, but nonetheless it offers a significant contribution to the development of a substantive ICT and school structure theory.

Practical implications

Supporting ICT integration called for intervention at the school's top management level; supporting an initial ICT‐based project enhances the school's control over the implementation process, and provides schools with additional resources.

Originality/value

This study bears a substantive theory regarding ICT and school structure, and fosters new insights and propositions for further research.

Citation

Tubin, D. (2007), "When ICT meets schools: differentiation, complexity and adaptability", Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 45 No. 1, pp. 8-32. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230710722430