To read this content please select one of the options below:

Full costing of business programs: benefits and caveats

Cynthia Simmons (Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada)
Michael Wright (Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada)
Vernon Jones (Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada)

International Journal of Educational Management

ISSN: 0951-354X

Article publication date: 1 January 2006

3781

Abstract

Purpose

To suggest an approach to program costing that includes the approaches and concepts developed in activity based costing.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper utilizes a hypothetical case study of an Executive MBA program as a means of illustrating the suggested approach to costing.

Findings

The paper illustrates both the benefits of using an activity based costing approach and the danger of allocating organizational sustaining costs to a specific program for the purpose of assessing the profitability of that program.

Practical implications

University and faculty administrators will understand the benefits of activity based costing and they will understand that they should not evaluate the profitability of a program (nor make decisions about the termination of a program) on the basis of allocated organizational sustaining costs.

Originality/value

The value of the paper is to university and faculty administrators, who will be able to utilize a new approach to costing university programs.

Keywords

Citation

Simmons, C., Wright, M. and Jones, V. (2006), "Full costing of business programs: benefits and caveats", International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 29-42. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540610639576

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2006, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles