Advanced search

The service recovery paradox: justifiable theory or smoldering myth?

Vincent P. Magnini (College of Business and Economics, Longwood University, Farmville, Virginia, USA)
John B. Ford (College of Business and Public Administration, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, USA)
Edward P. Markowski (College of Business and Public Administration, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, USA)
Earl D. Honeycutt Jr (Love School of Business, Elon University, Elon, North Carolina, USA)

Journal of Services Marketing

ISSN: 0887-6045

Publication date: 29 May 2007

Abstract

Purpose

–

The purpose of this study is to address the discrepancy between research that supports the service failure recovery and that which does not by examining customer satisfaction in the event of a service failure empirically.

Design/methodology/approach

–

The objective of the study was achieved by conducting role‐play experiments on undergraduate business students.

Findings

–

Analysis showed that a service recovery paradox is most likely to occur when the failure is not considered by the customer to be severe, the customer has had no prior failure with the firm, the cause of the failure was viewed as unstable by the customer, and the customer perceived that the company had little control over the cause of the failure.

Originality/value

–

This information should benefit service managers since service failures are common and typically trigger heightened customer attention. These findings may stimulate future research because the limitations of this study include the use of undergraduate business students and the examination of only one service setting. Nevertheless, this paper does demonstrate that, under the appropriate conditions, a customer can experience a paradoxical satisfaction increase after a service failure.

Keywords

Citation

Magnini, V.P., Ford, J.B., Markowski, E.P. and Honeycutt, E.D. (2007), "The service recovery paradox: justifiable theory or smoldering myth?", Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040710746561

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2007, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.
Rent from Deepdyve
If you think you should have access to this content, click the button to contact our support team.
Contact us

We’re listening — tell us what you think

Join us on our journey