Bloggership, or is publishing a blog scholarship? A survey of academic librarians

Arthur Hendricks (Branford Price Millar Library, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA)

Library Hi Tech

ISSN: 0737-8831

Publication date: 7 September 2010

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this paper is to gauge how academic libraries treat publishing a blog.

Design/methodology/approach

As blogging becomes more popular, the question arises as to whether it should count as scholarship or a creative activity in academic promotion and tenure. To find out, the author sent a link to a questionnaire to several e‐mail lists, inviting academic librarians to answer a short survey.

Findings

In total, 73.9 percent of respondents indicated that their institution expects them to engage in scholarly activities and/or publish scholarly articles, 53.6 percent indicated that their performance review committees do not weigh a blog the same as an article published in a peer‐reviewed journal.

Research limitations/implications

As technology changes, policies will need to change.

Practical implications

Libraries may need to adapt to new forms of scholarship. Electronic scholarship needs a mechanism for peer‐review.

Originality/value

The paper is original – the author did not find any other surveys regarding blogging as scholarship in the library literature.

Keywords

Citation

Hendricks, A. (2010), "Bloggership, or is publishing a blog scholarship? A survey of academic librarians", Library Hi Tech, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 470-477. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831011076701

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2010, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.