Direct‐to‐consumer advertising of prescription drugs: help or hindrance to the public's health?

Greg Finlayson (Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada)
Ross Mullner (School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA)

Journal of Consumer Marketing

ISSN: 0736-3761

Publication date: 1 December 2005

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to review the issues regarding direct‐to‐consumer advertising that have been identified in the literature from the perspective of consumers, consumer groups, physicians, the medical profession and the pharmaceutical industry.

Design/methodology/approach

Literature from international sources was reviewed to identify themes relating to direct‐to‐consumer advertising.

Findings

Direct‐to‐consumer advertising is expressly permitted in only two developed countries (USA and New Zealand). All other countries place various limitations on the practice. The debate surrounds whether or not the advertising provides a public health benefit.

Originality/value

The debate over direct‐to‐consumer advertising continues in jurisdictions around the world. This paper identifies and summarizes the issues that are being considered.

Keywords

Citation

Finlayson, G. and Mullner, R. (2005), "Direct‐to‐consumer advertising of prescription drugs: help or hindrance to the public's health?", Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 22 No. 7, pp. 429-431. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760510631174

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2005, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.