Organizational learning style and competences: A comparative investigation of relationship and transactionally orientated small UK manufacturing firms

I. Chaston (Group Organizational Learning Development Centre, Plymouth Business School, University of Plymouth, UK)
B. Badger (Group Organizational Learning Development Centre, Plymouth Business School, University of Plymouth, UK)
E. Sadler‐Smith (Group Organizational Learning Development Centre, Plymouth Business School, University of Plymouth, UK)

European Journal of Marketing

ISSN: 0309-0566

Publication date: 1 June 2000

Abstract

In the literature, relationship orientated firms are being advised to exploit organizational learning as a route through which to acquire the knowledge required to survive in rapidly changing and/or highly competitive markets. There is, however, only limited anecdotal evidence of the positive contribution that organizational learning can make to enhancing the performance of firms. To acquire additional empirical data, a survey of learning style and perception of competences relative to competitors in small manufacturing firms was undertaken. Results concerning organizational learning style appear to indicate the firms who exhibit a relationship marketing style tend to adopt a double‐loop (or table8.TIFigher order) learning style; whereas transactionally orientated firms appear to be single‐loop learners. When compared with transactional firms, relationship orientated respondents also reported higher competences for some areas of marketing, HRM and information management practices. This conclusion was further validated through telephone interviews. The implications of these findings are discussed and proposals presented on the need for further research.

Keywords

Citation

Chaston, I., Badger, B. and Sadler‐Smith, E. (2000), "Organizational learning style and competences: A comparative investigation of relationship and transactionally orientated small UK manufacturing firms", European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 34 No. 5/6, pp. 625-642. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560010321965

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2000, MCB UP Limited

To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below

You may be able to access this content by logging in via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.
If you think you should have access to this content, click the button to contact our support team.