To read this content please select one of the options below:

Branding Terminology – The Real Debate

Gil McWilliam (The Managerial School, Imperial College, London and Cranfield School of Management)
Leslie De Chernatony (The Managerial School, Imperial College, London and Cranfield School of Management)

Marketing Intelligence & Planning

ISSN: 0263-4503

Article publication date: 1 July 1989

660

Abstract

This article argues that there are strategic implications associated with our understanding and usage of marketing terminology, in particular the use of the word “brand”. It shows how the term “own‐label” has become meaningless and how the terms “manufacturer brand” and “distributor brand” are better descriptors. It further argues that even this distinction is not enough. The term “brand” itself may be too broad in its meaning to be useful. Given the variety of meanings and roles attributed to brands, yet more clarification is required. It is suggested that when a distinction is made between functional and representational brands then the marketing strategies which result may be very different. The need for such clarification is thus seen to be essential.

Keywords

Citation

McWilliam, G. and De Chernatony, L. (1989), "Branding Terminology – The Real Debate", Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 7 No. 7/8, pp. 29-32. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634509010002891

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1989, MCB UP Limited

Related articles