Networking with boundary spanners: A quasi‐case study on why women are less likely to be offered an engineering role
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to explore a potential mechanism through which gender segregation in the engineering profession is created and sustained. Specifically, boundary spanners for women and men were examined because they may be a source of valuable information to job seekers.
Design/methodology/approach
Applicant data for the role of a senior technical engineer (n=100) from an engineering organisation in the UK were analyzed.
Findings
A logistic regression analysis showed that women applicants were significantly less likely than men to be offered a job as a senior engineer. A mediation analysis revealed that women did not use networking with boundary spanners as a primary job search tool, providing a partial explanation for why women are less likely to be hired in senior engineering roles.
Originality/value
This study uses a dataset collected in 2009 to widen the investigative lens of processes that influence hiring outcomes for women in a male‐stereotyped job, namely, engineering.
Keywords
Citation
Shantz, A., Wright, K. and Latham, G. (2011), "Networking with boundary spanners: A quasi‐case study on why women are less likely to be offered an engineering role", Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 217-232. https://doi.org/10.1108/02610151111124950
Publisher
:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2011, Emerald Group Publishing Limited