To read this content please select one of the options below:

Business transfers and contracting out: Compulsory competitive tendering in tatters?

Nick Adnett (Principal Lecturer, Economics Division, Institute of Industrial and Commercial Law, at Staffordshire University, Stoke‐on‐Trent, UK.)
Stephen Hard (Stephen Hardy is Research Scholar, Institute of Industrial and Commercial Law, at Staffordshire University, Stoke‐on‐Trent, UK.)
Richard Painter (Dean of the Law School, at Staffordshire University, Stoke‐on‐Trent, UK.)

Employee Relations

ISSN: 0142-5455

Article publication date: 1 December 1995

761

Abstract

Compulsory competitive tendering (CCT) and market testing are central and controversial planks of government economic policy. Critics question the level of efficiency gains which flows from the process and point to the deterioration of workers′ terms and conditions of employment in the aftermath of contracting out exercises. Recent case law, in extending employment protection rights to workers caught up in contracting‐out exercises, may make CCT a much less attractive proposition to private contractors. Analyses recent developments and, in the context of the draft revised directive on business transfers, poses the question whether CCT is destined to become a failed economic experiment.

Keywords

Citation

Adnett, N., Hard, S. and Painter, R. (1995), "Business transfers and contracting out: Compulsory competitive tendering in tatters?", Employee Relations, Vol. 17 No. 8, pp. 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425459510103460

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1995, MCB UP Limited

Related articles