Organizational commitment to employees and organizational performance: A simultaneous test of configurative and universalistic propositions

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of organizational commitment to employees (OCE) on organizational performance through two different approaches – a configurative approach and a universalistic approach. The theoretical model formulated in this paper integrates both propositions with the aim of analyzing which has the most relevant impact on organizational performance.

Design/methodology/approach

Structural equation models were applied to test these propositions by means of a survey of a random sample of 230 service firms.

Findings

It was found that the configurational hypothesis is more important than the universalist hypothesis.

Research limitations/implications

The study only included information from one member of executive management staff. This study is an initial attempt in the strategic human resource management literature to examine the configurative perspective as a covariation pattern.

Practical implications

OCE by itself does not affect organizational performance. It is necessary to consider the context in which it is applied in order to understand the effect of OCE on performance. This explains why not all employers pursue an OCE model.

Originality/value

It is proved that “fit as covariation” can be adequate for studying the configurative theory. A complementary vision of the configurative and universalistic hypotheses was adopted, according to which these two hypotheses are not contradictory and could be tested simultaneously.

Citation

Roca‐Puig, V., Beltrán‐Martín, I., Escrig‐Tena, A.B. and Carlos Bou‐Llusar, J. (2007), "Organizational commitment to employees and organizational performance: A simultaneous test of configurative and universalistic propositions", Personnel Review, Vol. 36 No. 6, pp. 867-886. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480710822409