Search results

Human beings spend their daily lives within the range of the atmospheric boundary layer, where airflow is affected by friction from Earth's surface. The airflow in this area is generally called wind. Strong wind occasionally causes severe damage to infrastructures and people because of its aerodynamic effects, but even weak and moderate winds can have serious environmental impacts on human society such as those seen with air-pollution problems and thermal effects.

Purpose – To examine the implications of arms export controls on the international spread of weapons production and innovation.

Methodology/approach – The chapter analyses predicted responses to arms export controls, drawing on existing literature. It considers incentives to potential buyer countries to develop their own substitutes and a case study of Australia's response to US denial of access to electronic warfare self-protection (EWSP) technology for fighter aircraft.

Findings – Spurred by the US denial of access to relevant EWSP, Australia devoted many years to developing a homegrown substitute. Although Australia achieved some success, the United States ultimately granted Australia access to the technology. Australia then abandoned research, design and development (RD&D) on EWSP for fast jets in 2009. Cause and effect remain a matter of debate.

Research limitations/implications – Insight into the real-world value of the theory is limited by the use of a single case study. Such cases supported by publicly available information are, however, scarce. Countries seeking to circumvent export controls must expect to incur high costs and uncertain outcomes.

Practical implications – Policy-makers should be wary about committing large budgets in developing substitutes for new technologies denied them through export controls. Such efforts may, however, offer the possibility of putting suppliers under pressure unavailable from other actions.

Social implications – Arms export controls designed to limit proliferation of weapons create incentives for states to develop their capabilities for new arms production and to develop new weapons-related knowledge.

Originality/value of the chapter – This chapter provides a new case study which illustrates an innovative approach to arms export control analysis.

When it comes to discovering the leaders of the future, how can hiring organizations build a more sensitive talent radar to pick up signals of early-stage talent? What do upcoming leaders need to do to appear on that radar? What kind of search strategy is needed to find the exceptional candidate? Based on dozens of interviews with talent development specialists, we present 11 characteristics that emerge as keys to success. We present a case that illustrates why executive search is high stakes-game of responsible positions, and examine why talent alone is no guarantee of success.

An earlier form of this chapter by the author was published in Dutch in “Bestemming Boardroom: over zoeken en gevonden worden” (Boom, Amsterdam, 2018) and in English (online) by the Amrop Partnership (2021) as “Destination Boardroom 2: The Talent Radar.”

The Gandhian-Vedic approach to development is synonymous with the advancement of spiritual agency. It emancipates society by trying to raise people's interconnectedness with nature, mitigating capitalism's hegemony of consumerism on people's psyche and hence reducing the chances of individuals perpetuating the cycle of exploitation by adhering to capitalist norms. That is, the Gandhian-Vedic approach to discursive accountability minimises the risk of circularity in the dialectics of contradictions, which occurs when consenting behaviour replaces existing contradictions with another set of contradictions. It enables the actor to step off capitalism's treadmill of materialism and exploitation by centralising spiritual development. Its spiritual revolution involves caring for the whole whilst engaging with social structures. Here the Gandhian-Vedic logic is extended to emancipatory accounting by developing accounting as a discursive risk assessment tool that minimises the fragmentation of time and space aspects of performance. Its holistic representation of performance could change perceptions about interconnectedness between an individual's behaviour, nature and society. It is the antithesis of conventional accounting's prioritisation of private interest over responsibility for the whole.

Scientists are constructing knowledge about global warming by adapting evidence-based disciplines to reflect the Precautionary Principle. It is equally important to communicate the complexities and uncertainties underpinning global warming because inappropriate vehicles for giving accounts could result in defensive decisions that perpetuate the business-as-usual mindset: the method of communication affects how the risk associated with global warming is socialised. Appropriately constructed accounts should facilitate reflective communicative action. Here Beck's theorisation of risk society, Luhmann's sociological theory of risk and Gandhi's vehicle of communicative action (or satyagraha) are used to construct a risk-based accountability mechanism, whilst providing insight into Schumacher's concept of total accountability. These accountability constructs will be illustrated through the lived experiences of South Australian citrus horticulturists in the context of a richly layered narrative of competing discourses about global warming. The reiterative process of theory informing practice is used to construct a couple of dialogical vehicles of accountability.

At the same time, new military and political factors have emerged, which determine the strategy of the Russian defense industry, rates of its development, and change of the structure. On February 8, of the current year, the chief of Pentagon, R. Gates spoke at a session of the Committee for the Armed Forces of the Chamber of Representatives of the Congress, declaring that USA should be ready to possible military conflicts with other countries including Russia and China: “We need the whole spectrum of war facilities for army involving conflicts, since we do not know what could happen in such places as Russia, China, North Korea, Iran and other.”¹ As a result, the USA military policy is encircling Russia with antimissile defense systems. They are supposed to install a powerful radar in the Czech Republic and shaft-basing missiles in Poland. A superpowerful floating radar is to be transferred from Hawaii islands to Aleut islands, etc. Thus, the whole territory of Russia will be surrounded with radar-missile complexes. These activities will produce an increased attention to elaboration and manufacturing of constituents of the antimissile defense system and by-pass systems, possible withdrawal from the Treaty on conventional weapons in Europe and the Treaty on medium-range strategic missiles etc., which may change the direction and paces of development of the defense industry.

Redefining the word “power” within the realm of corporate social responsibility, with support from individuals, families, and universities, supposes radical social change. Therein, firms aim to exercise leadership and yet are faced with unanswered questions from political, sociological, legal, and economic institutions. As an agent of change the most practical and effective approach for a company is innovation that imitates nature and utilizes a combination of technological and humanistic knowledge. Workers from multiple disciplines form the theoretical and methodological foundations on which the company can empower itself.