Search results
1 – 2 of 2Chinmoy Ghosh, Paul Gilson and Michel Rakotomavo
The purpose of this paper is to present a review of the student managed investment fund at the School of Business, University of Connecticut.
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to present a review of the student managed investment fund at the School of Business, University of Connecticut.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors trace the history and growth of the fund and identify the special features and dimensions that have contributed to its success.
Findings
The operation of the fund is a constantly evolving program and the authors discuss the important changes and improvements made in the program since its inception in the early 2000s in response to growth in the number of finance majors, new career opportunities in the field of investments and most importantly, the strength of capital markets and the development of new instruments in the capital markets. The authors also discuss the common features of over 300 student funds in the USA. The authors close with a discussion of the limitations and constraints the fund advisors at, and possibly, at other schools, face in the management and administration of the fund, and also what developments and adjustments the authors expect to see in these funds in the future.
Originality/value
The authors combine extensive analyses of fund history and performance. The authors also provide some suggestions for the future direction and priorities for student funds.
Details
Keywords
The paper aims to examine whether corporate investment in social responsibility takes away from expected dividends.
Abstract
Purpose
The paper aims to examine whether corporate investment in social responsibility takes away from expected dividends.
Design/methodology/approach
The article builds two hypotheses that are tested empirically through the analysis of 17,670 US firm‐year observations covering the period 1991‐2007. The tests are conducted in both univariate and multivariate settings.
Findings
The evidence supports the hypothesis that mature firms tend to invest more in corporate social responsibility (CSR). Specifically, firms investing highly in CSR tend to be larger, more profitable, and with greater earned (rather than contributed) equity. The evidence also supports the hypothesis that CSR investment does not subtract from dividends. Instead, CSR effort and dividend tend to increase together. Thus, CSR investment tends to be effected by companies who can afford it, and it does not lower value by lowering investors' expected payout.
Practical implications
These results imply that spending resources on CSR does not lower the cash flows paid out to investors. When combined with the finding that CSR lowers the cost of equity, they also mean that CSR increases the value of a company's stock.
Originality/value
This is the first study that explicitly links CSR to the dividend flow.
Details