Search results
1 – 2 of 2Joanna Kubik, Meagan Docherty, Paul Boxer, Bonita Veysey and Michael Ostermann
Research suggests that gang-involved youth are more likely than non-gang youth to experience victimization. However, very little research has addressed the issue of whether the…
Abstract
Purpose
Research suggests that gang-involved youth are more likely than non-gang youth to experience victimization. However, very little research has addressed the issue of whether the relationship between gang involvement and victimization depends on the context in which victimization takes place. The purpose of this paper is to examine the nature of the relation between gang involvement and violent victimization in both street and school contexts.
Design/methodology/approach
Data were provided by youth (n=421; ages 11-18; 70 percent male; 66 percent non-white) referred by the justice system for intensive home and community-based treatment of problem behavior. At intake, youth reported on their experiences of violent victimization, mental health status, problem behavior, and substance use. Youth and therapist reports were utilized to indicate gang involvement.
Findings
Approximately 62 percent of gang-involved youth in the sample were victimized across both contexts. Linear and censored regression models found that on average, gang-involved youth experienced a greater frequency of victimization than non-gang youth (p < 0.001). Importantly, results also show that gang involvement amplifies the impact of victimization on key behavioral and mental health outcomes. Victimization in both street and school contexts increases the risk of serious problem behavior for gang-involved youth (p < 0.001). Victimization experiences in schools in particular also may increase alcohol use among gang-involved youth (p=0.006).
Originality/value
These findings emanating from a unique sample of youth in treatment demonstrate the value of considering victimization in context for intervention programming.
Details
Keywords
Marco Galvagno, Vincenzo Pisano and Sonia M. Strano
This study aims to review family business branding research, elaborate a new framework integrating family business branding and corporate brand management literature and finally…
Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to review family business branding research, elaborate a new framework integrating family business branding and corporate brand management literature and finally identify future research directions.
Design/methodology/approach
A bibliometric analysis was conducted to present the main research topics within family business branding.
Findings
The contributions of this study are threefold. First, this study maps the main themes of family business branding research and highlights its fragmented nature. Second, this study proposes an overarching framework based on signaling theory, attempts to bridge the family business branding and corporate brand management literature and provides a lead for future research. Third, this study stresses the role of brand construct in family business branding.
Originality/value
This study represents an important step in the identification of a new theoretical framework that best fits the investigation of family business branding.
Details