Search results
1 – 2 of 2Jennifer Jarson and Rachel Hamelers
While many librarians have celebrated the pedagogical inspiration offered by the ACRL Framework, some have raised concerns about the comprehensibility and accessibility of its…
Abstract
Purpose
While many librarians have celebrated the pedagogical inspiration offered by the ACRL Framework, some have raised concerns about the comprehensibility and accessibility of its language, particularly for students. The authors sought to understand if introducing the language of the frames explicitly – in addition to using them as the implicit foundation of our teaching – resonated with these undergraduates. This case study investigates how undergraduates at a liberal arts institution interpreted the Framework’s language and concepts in relation to their independent research.
Design/methodology/approach
In this case study, the authors analyzed 25 undergraduates’ reflections on their information literacy learning guided by recommendations for thematic analysis of qualitative data from Braun and Clarke (2006) and Castleberry and Nolen (2018). These steps included closely reading the reflections, disassembling and reassembling by frame, coding for themes, and finding trends and patterns.
Findings
The authors’ analysis of students’ reflections offers insight into how these students interpreted the Framework’s language and related it to their own experience. By noting language that seemed to resonate in this instance, the authors suggest ways in which educators could effectively use the Framework’s language with undergraduates.
Originality/value
Other studies in this area have generally been conducted with semester-long general education courses. This case study explores if explicit use of the Framework’s language outside of the classroom setting can resonate with undergraduates. Expanding research into different academic contexts enhances our understanding of how librarians may use the Framework as an explicit pedagogical tool.
Details
Keywords
The purpose of this article is to survey the means through which libraries and writing centers are collaborating to determine best practices and applications.
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this article is to survey the means through which libraries and writing centers are collaborating to determine best practices and applications.
Design/methodology/approach
Examples of collaboration between libraries and writing centers were examined and grouped into similar examples to highlight themes within the literature.
Findings
Many librarians are training writing center staff and tutors in library services and information literacy skills. Reference librarians are sharing space or holding joint office hours with writing centers to help create a one‐stop shop for students. Joint classes and workshops are helping to reinforce the connected nature of research and writing. It is important to survey the environment; some types of collaboration work better at some institutions than others.
Research limitations/implications
This is a review of the literature concerning collaboration and cannot contain every example of library and writing center collaboration.
Practical implications
Using this article, librarians can compile a list of possible ways to collaborate with their writing center.
Originality/value
This article is of value to librarians and writing center staff looking for ways to foster collaboration and ways that they can begin to collaborate.
Details