Search results
1 – 3 of 3Frits M. van der Meer and Gerrit S.A. Dijkstra
This paper looks into the mechanisms that determine (stimulate and limit) the scope for loyal contradiction in organizations through ex ante voice. The paper provides insights…
Abstract
Purpose
This paper looks into the mechanisms that determine (stimulate and limit) the scope for loyal contradiction in organizations through ex ante voice. The paper provides insights into how this essential civil service function and obligation can be maintained and the role that public leadership can play in addressing these issues.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper consists of a conceptual analysis of major determinants for constraints on and stimuli of loyal contradiction and provides an interpretational framework of the relevant factors involved.
Findings
This paper examines the mechanisms that determine (stimulate and limit) the scope for loyal contradiction in organizations through ex ante voice and provides insights into how to maintain this essential civil service function and obligation through the contribution of public leadership.
Practical implications
The findings of this paper offer insight into how to avoid constraints on loyal contradiction within public organizations and point to the way public leaders can, by facilitating and stimulating it, enhance organizational performance and legitimacy.
Originality/value
This paper points to an issue that is increasingly relevant in politics and public administration. By providing a conceptual framework, this paper provides a deeper understanding of how the necessary conditions for loyal contradiction can be created within public organizations.
Details
Keywords
Gerrit van Dalfsen, Jo Van Hoecke, Hans Westerbeek and Veerle De Bosscher
The purpose of this paper is to investigate coaches' views on developing leadership and shared leadership capacity in particular in competitive youth football.
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to investigate coaches' views on developing leadership and shared leadership capacity in particular in competitive youth football.
Design/methodology/approach
This qualitative examination focusses on the leadership philosophy of ten male coaches at the sub-elite competitive level in youth football in The Netherlands and applies the theory of shared leadership to examine coaches' views on developing leadership capacity.
Findings
Only few coaches have a clear philosophy on the development of leadership in general and/or shared leadership in particular. Most coaches do not have a distinct view on how to involve players in the team processes. Shared leadership development in youth teams occurs occasionally but can be implemented more intentionally.
Research limitations/implications
Although this study lacks generalizability, coaches' views are required in understanding how shared leadership is to be developed in youth sport.
Practical implications
For implementing shared leadership in football purposefully, a clear view on the development of youth is required, whereas coaches need to be taught, how to involve the individual players in team processes such as decision-making. In addition, leadership development in sport may have the potential of transfer of skills to other domains.
Social implications
Learning shared leadership at a young age by athletes can have a positive influence on relationships in teams on micro-level and might have an impact on meso-level within a football club because of its social constructionist approach.
Originality/value
This study is one of the first to apply shared leadership at the micro-level of competitive youth football making use of football coaches' view.
Details