Search results
1 – 10 of 322Suzanna Opree, Moniek Buijzen and Eva van Reijmersdal
The aim of this study is to determine which of previously used survey measures can be considered the most appropriate to assess children’s advertising exposure. First, three…
Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study is to determine which of previously used survey measures can be considered the most appropriate to assess children’s advertising exposure. First, three levels of content specificity for assessing children’s exposure to advertising were distinguished as follows: exposure to the medium, exposure to broad content and exposure to specific (i.e. commercial) content. Second, using longitudinal data from 165 children between 8 and 11 years old, the test-retest reliability and content validity of survey measures from all three levels were examined.
Design/methodology/approach
Due to societal concerns about the effects of advertising on children’s well-being, research into this topic is expanding. To enhance knowledge accumulation and bring uniformity to the field, a validated standard survey measure of advertising exposure is needed. The aim of this study is to provide such measures for television and internet advertising.
Findings
The findings suggest that all measures provided solid estimates for children’s television and internet advertising exposure. Yet, due to minor differences in reliability and validity, it may be concluded that television advertising exposure can best be measured by asking children how often they watch certain popular (commercial) television networks, either weighting or not weighting for advertising density. Internet advertising exposure can best be measured by asking children how often they use the internet or how often they visit certain popular websites, weighting for advertising density.
Originality/value
The current measures for children’s advertising exposure through traditional media can easily be adapted to fit new media.
Details
Keywords
Valentina Nicolini and Fabio Cassia
This study aims to examine the different effects that the fear and humor appeals in anti-smoking advertisements for children have on their affective reactions to the…
Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to examine the different effects that the fear and humor appeals in anti-smoking advertisements for children have on their affective reactions to the advertisements, on their beliefs about smoking and on their behavioral intentions to smoke.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper presents the findings of a qualitative research study conducted in Italy with children aged from 8 to 11 years.
Findings
The results indicated that the humor appeal is a useful method for conveying a social theme in a pleasant way and creating a likable character that becomes an example for children to imitate; however, it is necessary to employ the fear appeal to make children reflect carefully about the negative consequences of smoking.
Research limitations/implications
This study examined only children's behavioral intentions derived from anti-smoking advertisements, but future research should also examine their real behaviors after a period following repeated viewing of public service announcements about smoking prevention or other social issues.
Practical implications
Understanding how different types of appeals can influence children represents an important result for the prevention of youth smoking and the promotion of healthy lifestyle habits during childhood.
Social implications
Understanding how different types of appeals can influence children represents an important result for the prevention of youth smoking and the promotion of healthy lifestyle habits during childhood.
Originality/value
Few studies have examined the impact of social advertisements on children, and particularly little is known about the effectiveness of fear appeals on this group.
Details
Keywords
Abstract
Details
Keywords
Abstract
Details
Keywords
Abstract
Details