Search results

The study attempts to investigate the relationship between emotional biases (loss aversion bias, overconfidence bias, and regret aversion bias) and investment decisions through a meta-analysis approach.

A meta-correlation analysis was done using sample size and correlation (r) data from several relevant studies that look at how emotional biases (loss aversion bias, regret aversion bias, and overconfidence bias) affect investment decisions. Additionally, beta coefficients (ß) were also converted to correlation coefficients (r) from six studies.

This study analysed 31 empirical studies and found a significant positive correlation between emotional biases and investment decisions [loss aversion bias (r = 0.492), regret aversion bias (r = 0.401), and overconfidence bias (r = 0.346)]. We set the statistical significance threshold at 0.05.

The review covered 31 online research publications that showed significant heterogeneity, possibly influenced by various methodological, population, or other factors. Furthermore, the use of correlational data restricts the ability to establish causation.

This is a novel attempt to integrate the results of various studies through meta-analysis on the relation between these emotional biases (loss aversion, overconfidence, and regret aversion) and investment decisions.

Despite city authorities in Bangladesh being concerned about urban sustainability, they often face difficulties in addressing predominant urban challenges threatening urban sustainability, due to limited relevant literature. To reduce this gap, this study aims to address the predominant urban challenges and assess their severity levels in four city corporations of Bangladesh, e.g. Rajshahi, Sylhet, Barishal, and Gazipur.

Using a mixed-method approach, this study rigorously analyzed field-level data obtained from 1,200 residents across selected cities using diverse statistical techniques. The quantitative analysis included descriptive analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and chi-square tests, whereas qualitative insights were derived through thematic analysis.

The study uncovered nine predominant urban challenges under two crucial factors “Feeble Urban Management” and “Illicit Activities” that collectively explain 62.20% variance. “Feeble Urban Management” explains 44.17% variance, whereas “Illicit Activities” accounts for 18.13%. Within these challenges, uncontrolled urban sprawl, inadequate disaster management, congested roads, and shabby drainage and waste management pose significant threats to urban sustainability. Illicit activities, manifested by encroachment on water sources, grabbing roadside, destruction of natural properties, and activities undermining social security, compound the urban sustainability issue. Severity analysis reveals Sylhet (54.5%), Rajshahi (46.4%), and Barishal (31.2%) as highly impacted, whereas Gazipur exhibits moderate severity (66.7%).

The findings of this study reveal intrinsic insights into urban challenges in Bangladesh that will provide valuable guidance to city authorities, equipping them to implement integrated and effective initiatives and programs that overcome these predominant urban challenges, with a specific focus on Rajshahi, Sylhet, and Barishal city corporations.