Search results

We study the role of having an audit committee (AC) as a signal of firm quality and as a monitoring device of the information quality contained in the listing prospectus.

Ordinary Least Squares regressions are used to examine the association between the presence of an audit committee and (1) the initial return (IR), and (2) the earnings forecast error in the listing prospectus in a sample of 55 Real Estate Investment Trusts that went public on the BME Growth market during 2013–2022. Heckman two-step estimation procedure to correct for endogeneity and bootstrap are used for robustness.

We show that IR and earnings forecasts are significantly affected by the presence of AC. The IR is higher and the earnings forecast included in the prospectus are of higher quality in firms with AC.

Our research provides (1) managers with new tools when deciding on their corporate governance structure in the listing process, (2) specific evidence for regulators on the role played by ACs in the process of going public, which may be useful in the context of the ongoing regulatory changes regarding admission processes in Europe, and (3) society with a sign that AC can enhance investor and public confidence in financial markets and foster a more stable and transparent investment environment.

The adoption of an AC is voluntary in this market, so this discretionary decision provides an exceptional opportunity to conduct such an analysis. Additionally, this issue has not been previously analysed in Europe.

我們擬探討審計委員會在作為是公司質素的一個信號, 以及在作為是監控上市招股書內資料質素的一個機制所扮演的角色。

研究人員使用普通最小二乘法回歸模型, 去探討審計委員會的存在與 (一) 初期回報、和 (二)上市招股書內收益預測的錯誤兩者之間的關聯。研究的樣本為55個於2013年 至 2022年間在 BME Growth 市場上市的不動產投資信託。研究人員使用自助法和可幫助修正內生性問題的赫克曼兩階段回歸, 以達數據的穩健性。

研究結果顯示, 審計委員會的存在會顯著地影響初期回報和收益預測。若公司採用審計委員會, 初期回報則會較高; 而且, 招股書內的收益預測也顯示較高的質素。

由於採用審計委員會與否在這研究的有關市場內純基於自主的決定、而非屬強制性, 因此, 與這決定有關的課題為學者提供了特殊的研究機會。再者, 在歐洲至今似仍未有學者曾嘗試探討這個課題。

本研究帶來以下實務方面的啟示: (一) 當經理需決定其在上市過程中的公司治理結構時, 本研究為他們提供了新的工具給他們使用; (二) 本研究為調控者就公司上市過程中審計委員會所扮演的角色提供具體的證據。而這因歐洲正進行更改與批核上市有關的規管而可能使其產生用處; (三) 本研究為社會提供一個信號, 顯示審計委員會不但可增強投資者和大眾對金融市場的信心, 而且還能培育更穩定和透明的投資環境。

公司治理、審計委員會、上市、初期回報、盈餘預測、不動產

Technological advancements and global societal changes reshapes manufacturing industry emphasizing needs for competence development of industrial professionals. The purpose of this paper is to study how organizational learning supports the development of academic structures, creating agile and sustainable formal educational models meeting novel competence needs.

The qualitative case study, part of a longitudinal research study, focuses on internal academic processes supporting a new formal educational model. Qualitative data was collected through five focus groups, incorporating 32 informants from different HEI function categories.

Changing traditional academic structures requires joint engagement between all HEI functions, emphasizing organizational learning with subprocesses of searching, creating, sustaining and exchanging knowledge in a learning loop. Results show a consensus among the different HEI functions regarding the value of the HEI’s coproduction with society; however, bureaucracy and academic structure hinder flexibility. Cross-functional teams building a “chain-of-trust” throughout the HEI coupled with full management support show opportunities to progress into a learning organization.

Organizational learning within HEIs requires trustful and open communication, multifunction knowledge exchange, holistic views of processes and system thinking, achieved through cross-functional teams and continuous improvement through learning loops.

Industry-academic collaboration on formal education for lifelong learning needs to become both agile and resilience to meet technological advancement and sustainability.

Novel technology, digitalization and sustainability gain ground and require that society and organizations, including academia, change and learn. This means that academia is meeting new challenges and needs to develop internal processes.

In 2000, Cañibano et al. published a literature review entitled “Accounting for Intangibles: A Literature Review”. This paper revisits the conclusions drawn in that paper. We also discuss the intervening developments in scholarly research, standard setting and practice over the past 20+ years to outline the future challenges for research into accounting for intangibles.

We conducted a literature review to identify past developments and link the findings to current accounting standard-setting developments to inform our view of the future.

Current intangibles accounting practices are conservative and unlikely to change. Accounting standard setters are more interested in how companies report and disclose the value of intangibles rather than changing how they are determined. Standard setters are also interested in accounting for new forms of digital assets and reporting economic, social, governance and sustainability issues and how these link to financial outcomes. The IFRS has released complementary sustainability accounting standards for disclosing value creation in response to the latter. Therefore, the topic of intangibles stretches beyond merely how intangibles create value but how they are also part of a firm’s overall risk and value creation profile.

There is much room academically, practically, and from a social perspective to influence the future of accounting for intangibles. Accounting standard setters and alternative standards, such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and European Union non-financial and sustainability reporting directives, are competing complementary initiatives.

Our results reveal a window of opportunity for accounting scholars to research and influence how intangibles and other non-financial and sustainability accounting will progress based on current developments.