To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below:

The Library World Volume 12 Issue 3

New Library World

ISSN: 0307-4803

Article publication date: 1 September 1909

Abstract

IN making the suggestion, as some of my friendly critics have done, that the classes Fine and Useful Arts should be restored, as in Dewey, they rather miss the humour of the situation. The Subject Classification is not an amended Dewey or Cutter, but a humble attempt at an entirely new system, designed to meet the needs of popular libraries. It is not even a classification of knowledge, but, as experience has proved, a very practical and simple rearrangement of the factors of knowledge as set forth and preserved in books. The scheme is not indebted to any other system for aught but suggestions of main classes; all the details of the tables having been worked out independently, without reference to any classification save the Adjustable. It will be manifest, on reflection, that it would be fatal for the compiler of a new system to allow himself to be fettered or influenced by the schedules of other authors. I am one of those who decline to believe in the value of standardization of ideas or practice, save to a small degree in certain mechanical matters, and it would therefore be foolish to follow in the same rut as certain predecessors, simply because a longer existence has to some extent established their findings as settled conventions.

Citation

(1909), "The Library World Volume 12 Issue 3", New Library World, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 80-120. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb008926

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1909, MCB UP Limited