Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study is to assess the mediating effect of source appearance (SA) and self-influencer congruence (SIC) on the relationship between visual content (VC) and customer engagement (CE) towards mobile advertisement.
Design/methodology/approach
This study uses a quantitative approach to test the proposed model based on the stimulus–organism–response (SOR) theory. The non-probability purposive sampling technique was used to collect data from Pakistani mobile users through a self-administered questionnaire.
Findings
The study results prove that VC alone cannot generate mobile users’ engagement. SA is the key in this regard, which has a relatively higher importance compared to SIC. Furthermore, the serial mediation effect of SA and SIC on CE shows that attractive sources are likely to induce higher SIC and subsequent CE.
Practical implications
The results reveal that without a pleasing SA and positive SIC, mobile users skip the ads by perceiving them to be irritating or interruptive. Mobile ads might cost relatively less, but the advertisers should understand the significance of the SA toward minimizing the mobile advertising skepticism.
Originality/value
Advertisers can enhance the user’s engagement on mobile devices by addressing both the SA and SIC in their VC. The combined effect of both the SA and SIC on CE has not been assessed before. Furthermore, this study has used the SOR mechanism to examine CE.
Propósito
El objetivo general de esta investigación es evaluar el efecto mediador de la apariencia de la fuente (SA) y la congruencia del auto-influencer (SIC) en la relación entre el contenido visual (CV) y el compromiso del cliente (CE) hacia la publicidad móvil.
Diseño/metodología/enfoque
Este estudio utiliza un enfoque cuantitativo para probar el modelo propuesto basado en la teoría estímulo-organismo-respuesta (SOR). Se utilizó la técnica de muestreo intencional no probabilístico para recoger datos de usuarios de móviles paquistaníes mediante un cuestionario autoadministrado.
Conclusiones
Nuestros resultados demuestran que el contenido visual por sí solo no puede generar el compromiso de los usuarios de móviles. La apariencia de la fuente es la clave a este respecto, que tiene una importancia relativamente mayor en comparación con la congruencia del auto-influencer. Además, el efecto de mediación en serie de SA y SIC en CE muestra que es probable que las fuentes atractivas induzcan un mayor SIC y el consiguiente compromiso del cliente.
Implicaciones prácticas
Los resultados revelan que sin una SA agradable y una SIC positiva, los usuarios de móviles omiten los anuncios al percibirlos como irritantes o interruptores. Los anuncios para móviles pueden costar relativamente menos, pero los anunciantes deben comprender la importancia de la apariencia de la fuente para minimizar el escepticismo de la publicidad móvil.
Originalidad/valor
Los anunciantes pueden mejorar la participación del usuario en los dispositivos móviles abordando tanto la AS como el SIC en sus contenidos visuales. Hasta ahora no se había evaluado el efecto combinado de la AS y el SIC en el CE. Además, este estudio ha utilizado el mecanismo del SOR para examinar el engagement del cliente.
目的
本研究的总体目标是评估源外观(SA)和自我影响者一致性(SIC)对移动广告视觉内容(VC)和客户参与(CE)之间关系的中介效应。
设计/方法/途径
本研究采用定量方法来检验基于刺激-有机体-反应(SOR)理论提出的模型。研究采用了非概率目的性抽样技术, 通过自填问卷的方式向巴基斯坦移动用户收集数据。
研究结果
我们的研究结果证明, 仅靠视觉内容并不能引起移动用户的参与。在这方面, 源外观是关键, 与自我影响者一致性相比, 源外观的重要性相对更高。此外, SA 和 SIC 对 CE 的串联中介效应表明, 有吸引力的信息源可能会诱发更高的 SIC 和随后的客户参与。
实际意义
研究结果表明, 如果没有令人愉悦的SA和积极的SIC, 移动用户就会认为广告具有刺激性或干扰性, 从而跳过广告。移动广告的成本可能相对较低, 但广告商应了解广告源外观对减少移动广告怀疑的重要性。
独创性/价值
广告商可以通过在视觉内容中同时考虑广告联盟和广告投放中心这两个因素, 提高用户在移动设备上的参与度。之前从未有人评估过 “SA “和 “SIC “对消费者参与度的综合影响。此外, 本研究还使用了 SOR 机制来考察客户参与度。
Keywords
Citation
Talha, M., Tahir, Z. and Mehroush, I. (2024), "Enhancing customer engagement through source appearance and self-influencer congruence in mobile advertising", Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 382-401. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-03-2023-0073
Publisher
:Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2023, Muhammad Talha, Zonaib Tahir and Iqra Mehroush.
License
Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
1. Introduction
Mobile advertising is assigned a substantial portion of companies’ overall marketing spending because it is viewed as an essential strategy (Hashim et al., 2018; Stefko et al., 2022). The amount spent on mobile advertising would reach around 399.6 Billion U.S dollar by 2024, an increase of 17.2% from the previous year (Statista, 2023). The idea of mobile advertising arose nearly two decades ago and plays a significant role in providing customized advertising messages, better advertisement recognition, improving customer willingness to buy, engaging customers and creating customers’ perceived value from branded mobile apps (Kumar and Pansari, 2016; Murillo-Zegarra et al., 2020; Park and Park, 2020; Park and Gong, 2023). Even though the recent pandemic led the businesses to embrace a new reality, managers have yet to formulate a strategic direction for such situations (Ketter and Avraham, 2021). Having said that, skepticism toward mobile advertisements remains a primary concern for marketers, which can be addressed through customer engagement (CE) (Hollebeek et al., 2022).
The scope of consumer engagement includes those who do not make purchases but can influence the brand by posting information on the brands’ social media platforms (Sharma et al., 2022). The previous studies (Barari et al., 2021; Rosado-Pinto and Loureiro, 2020) have identified CE as an essential component of business success (Kumar and Pansari, 2016), brand loyalty (Li et al., 2020), word of mouth, satisfaction and trust (Rosado-Pinto and Loureiro, 2020; de Oliveira Santini et al., 2020). However, the term CE refers to “the behavioural manifestation of a customer toward a brand or firm, beyond purchases, stemming from motivational cues” (Van Doorn et al., 2010). Users are more likely to respond to mobile advertising when they have favorable interactions with a product and begin offering positive feedback (Gao and Zang, 2016; Kim and Read, 2022). The current research makes an effort to investigate the connection between visual content (VC) and CE in advertising to understand mobile users’ behaviour with advertisements. The findings of this study could help reduce mobile users’ skepticism toward advertisements.
Interestingly, source appearance (SA) in the mobile advertising context is less explored. Prior studies have mainly focused on the social media influencers’ credibility (Weismueller et al., 2020), attractiveness, expertise, trustworthiness (Wiedmann and von Mettenheim, 2020; Cvirka et al., 2022) and impact on customer purchase intention (Kurdi et al., 2022). The source’s physical attractiveness provokes customer sentiments (Samarasinghe, 2018; Kim and Park, 2023) where the mobile users tend to match their actual and ideal selves with the source in the ads (Xu and Pratt, 2018) for meanings as well as associations (Shan et al., 2020). Even though customers have a positive emotional response to the source when the source is likable (Teng and Tsai, 2020; Sanders, 2006), familiar (Roy, 2006) and similar (Lou and Yuan, 2019; Wies et al., 2023), there has been limited research on SA as a mediator in the mobile advertising literature, which leaves room for determining its effects on CE.
Researchers have demonstrated self-influencer congruence (SIC) as an independent variable in the context of social media influencers (Shan et al., 2020), which impacts consumer behaviour (Zogaj et al., 2021), and purchase intentions (Absharina et al., 2021). SIC holds great significance as it enhances customers’ visit intentions (Xu and Pratt, 2018), attitude toward brand content and content engagement (Zogaj et al., 2021). Researchers also proved that the compatibility of customer’s ideal self-image and the social media influencer’s image generates influential endorsements (Shan et al., 2020). Individuals use social media to follow influential users to feel more connected to the community (Xiao et al., 2021). However, customers engage with mobile ads when they perceive their actual and ideal self-congruence with the influencer (Xu and Pratt, 2018), which enhances the ads’ effectiveness (Lee et al., 2022). Resultantly, SIC has been used as a mediator in our current study to assess CE with mobile advertising.
Concerns remain about mobile users’ skepticism toward mobile advertisements (Yang et al., 2021; Nelson et al., 2021; de Sio et al., 2022), and it is of profound interest for marketers to identify the factors that help users’ engagement with mobile ads. The current study will assess the combined effect of SA and SIC on CE to deduce if it is greater than the individual effect of SA or SIC, which has not been addressed in the past studies (Rahman et al., 2022; Moorthy et al., 2022; Bazi et al., 2023). Second, while most studies have used the stimulus–organism–response (SOR) framework in the context of online purchase intention (Zhu et al., 2020; Suparno, 2020), customer response (Chopdar and Balakrishnan, 2020) and CE due to apps’ attributes (Tak and Gupta, 2021), this study contributes by using the SOR framework in the mobile advertising context to analyze the relationship between VC and CE. Finally, this study contributes by highlighting the significance of SA and SIC in mobile ads.
2. Literature review and hypotheses development
2.1 Visual content and customer engagement
VC primarily refers to illustrations, infographics and videos (Mayahi and Vidrih, 2022; Hou and Pan, 2023), which are used to convey messages to the intended audience (Krause, 2017). Its effectiveness improves when advertisers incorporate graphics and animations into exclusive photos or videos to reflect customers’ considerations toward mobile advertisements (Hatmaker, 2021; Appel et al., 2020). VC improves mobile users’ experience and enables them to connect with the influencer (Xiao et al., 2021). VC depicts customers’ willingness to engage with mobile ad visuals for relevant information and shopping (Kim and Kim, 2021; Almela-Baeza, et al., 2023). Although mobile users express the desire to watch mobile advertisements with good animations, graphics and visual effects, they are less interested in the textual content generated by the firm (Villarroel Ordenes et al., 2019).
Many scholars have proposed that VC improves engagement (Lee et al., 2018; Almela-Baeza, et al., 2023), attracts attention (Pieters and Wedel, 2007, 2004), drives satisfaction (Pansari and Kumar, 2017), builds loyalty (Rahi et al., 2021) and influences purchase intentions (Liu et al., 2022; Orús et al., 2017). The current research involves the CE dimensions that include an “identification,” which describes the online or offline users’ participation with mobile ads, an “interaction” that involves customers’ perception of belongingness to the advertised brand and finally, “absorption,” which includes the mobile user’s pleasant state when they play as a customer (So et al., 2014; Harrigan et al., 2017). Incentives help advertisers find the right people to show their ads to and let people see ads relevant to what they are watching (Spina, 2020; Mukherjee et al., 2023). In incentive-based advertising, the consumer gets a specific financial reward if they agree to receive promotions and campaigns on their mobile device (Karjaluoto and Alatalo, 2007). Similarly, customers’ purchase decisions are influenced by visuals containing retail price promotions (Song et al., 2018).
Researchers have suggested factors that may lead to video ad avoidance, such as previous exposure, habit, the time urgency effect, knowledge and ethics of online selling (Belanche et al., 2017; Jamil et al., 2022). Statistics on the amount of visual information published on social media sites like Facebook and Instagram continue to rise. The full graphic picture post on Facebook and Instagram receives more views, 36,490 and 51,651, respectively. While the post containing a human face, logo and words has fewer views on Facebook and Instagram, 14,571 and 32,630, respectively (Ahmadi et al., 2023). These statistics prove that the complete image in the VC with attractive visual graphics has more views than the image containing just words, a human face and a logo. The literature (Pieters and Wedel, 2007, 2004; Lee et al., 2018; Almela-Baeza, et al., 2023) has also classified VC as an integral part of company-generated content, which is used as stimulus in our model and, significantly affects how much people pay attention and is better at grabbing people’s attention (response). Therefore, based on the customers’ mobile advertising engagement behavior, the following hypothesis is put forth:
Visual content has a positive effect on customer engagement.
2.2 Source appearance as a mediator between visual content and customer engagement
The current study uses the source attractiveness theory (McGuire, 1985) for defining SA, which relies on elements including source likability, similarity and familiarity. Source likability enables engagement as customers are attracted toward the advertisement (McGuire, 1985; Priyankara et al., 2017). Source similarity is how similar the source seems to the receiver based on demographic or ideological factors (Lou and Yuan, 2019). Source familiarity is established when the customer says that they know and recognize the source in the mobile advertisement (Peetz, 2012). Similarly, Huang (2016) and Shen et al. (2022) explain that brand familiarity derives customers’ positive associations and satisfaction with the brand. During the pandemic lockdown, customers became more concerned with the advertisements of familiar brands on their mobile phones (Galoni et al., 2020).
Brands believe influencers are improving the visibility of their products by using video features on their mobile advertising platforms (Ketter and Avraham, 2021). The previous literature’s findings suggest that the vividness of the online product information affects individual attitudes, and displaying an authentic and honest video significantly impacts the audience’s desire to purchase (Flavián et al., 2017). People are more drawn to and influenced by aesthetically pleasing communicators than those who are less striking (Sanders, 2006; Teng and Tsai, 2020; Aggad et al., 2021). Similarly, the source’s physical appeal encourages users to interact with the advertisement by eliciting favorable emotions (Lou and Yuan, 2019; Kim and Park, 2023). Attractive people tend to be liked and admired more, and endorsements from those who are considered attractive tend to inspire consumers to emulate them by making purchases (Samarasinghe, 2018; Nugroho et al., 2022). Importantly, visually appealing animations and graphics make the advertisement more prominent and engaging for mobile users (Hatmaker, 2021; Appel et al., 2020). Customers may click on the link and watch the advertisement when they see a beautiful source with the background containing beautiful graphics, which may enhance CE with the mobile ad. It can be assumed that the SA mediates as organism between VC and CE. Hence, the proposed hypothesis is as follows:
Source appearance is a positive mediator between visual content and customer engagement.
2.3 Self-influencer congruence (SIC) as a mediator between visual content and customer engagement
SIC refers to the apparent resemblance between a consumer’s self-perception and the influencer’s image (Zhu et al., 2019). Celebrity endorsements affect how and what consumers do, ultimately impacting how consumers feel (Belch and Belch, 2021). Advertisers consider that a public figure may transform the way customers perceive a firm. People want to have the same trustworthy and appealing qualities as the influencers as they have a lot in common with them and want to be like them (Priyankara et al., 2017). Despite the plethora of media alternatives, advertisers still want to communicate and engage with their target audiences using mobile phones. Although, they are attempting to persuade individuals in the hopes that they will subsequently engage large groups of people based on their celebrity knowledge or some other characteristics (Jamil et al., 2022).
Advertisers are changing the layouts of their mobile advertisements to make more room for VC and grow their popularity on visual-focused platforms, mainly social media sites, e.g. Snapchat and Instagram (Hatmaker, 2021; Appel et al., 2020). The symbolic values of the brand shown through the VC in the mobile advertisement underline customers’ feelings (Zhao et al., 2023). The cognitive coherence between a consumer’s self-concept and the value-expressive attributes of a brand is a significant factor in measuring consumer behaviour, and the more a consumer feels that they are similar to a brand, the more likely they are to engage with that brand’s advertisement on their mobile phones (Xu and Pratt, 2018). Similarly, the live shows of online influencers offer fans a sense of gratification, which afterward fosters an inclination to endorse and intention to suggest these live events (Barta et al., 2023).
According to the social cognitive theory (Bandura, 1999; Schunk and DiBenedetto, 2020), the identification process starts when a person thinks that they look like a celebrity, social media influencer, etc. Customers are influenced by self-congruence via aesthetically appealing mobile advertisements that develop confidence in brands or products, develop brand trust and raise degrees of enjoyment with those brands or products (Sirgy, 1982; Hanaysha, 2022). Mobile users also recognize a match between their actual and ideal selves with the source for meanings and connections in the advertisements (Shan et al., 2020; Xu and Pratt, 2018). Similarly, the ideal and actual congruence between the user’s self and the celebrity image strengthens the self-brand relationships (Kwon and Ha, 2023) and the efficacy of the advertisement (Lee et al., 2022).
The followers participate with the influencers account and recommend it based on the perceived quality, quantity, uniqueness and the originality of the post on social sites (Casaló et al., 2020). Customers feel more connected to a brand when they engage with ads and follow famous figures on social media (Xiao et al., 2021), which provides better outcomes for advertisers. However, based on the SIC dimensions, which include ideal and actual selves (Zogaj et al., 2021; Malär et al., 2011), this study assumes SIC (organism) acts as a mediator between VC and CE in the context of mobile advertising. Hence, we put forth the following hypothesis:
Self-influencer congruence is a positive mediator between visual content and customer engagement.
2.4 Source appearance and self-influencer congruence as mediators between visual content and customer engagement
According to the source attractiveness theory (McGuire, 1985), the message’s acceptability is governed by the resemblance, recognizability and preference of the source, which enhance the user’s engagement with the mobile ads (Priyankara et al., 2017; Lou and Yuan, 2019; Sharma and Bumb, 2022). Attractive visuals enhance the prominence and appeal of the influencers in the mobile ads (Hatmaker, 2021). The user’s interaction with the social media ads positively influences their impulse buying behaviour (Yaprak and Çoban, 2023). The findings of Kim and Read’s (2022) experimental study suggest that smiling influencers increase perceptions of warmth and admiration, eliciting favorable consumer attitudes and behavioral intent regardless of product category or message orientation. According to Ketter and Avraham (2021), beautiful influencers boost the brand by leveraging video features on their mobile ad platforms to make them more appealing. Thus, the ability to graphically match consumers’ actions with influencers in mobile advertising enables one to identify the person they prefer based on their ideal selves (Brengman et al., 2022).
SA is linked to higher levels of favorable sentiments (Kim and Park, 2023), and attractive endorsers are more likely to encourage ambitious purchases (Nugroho et al., 2022). For instance, the spokesperson in the cosmetic industry is selected based on attractiveness, so customers are influenced and perceive congruence between themselves and the influencers (Samarasinghe, 2018). The ideal and actual congruence between the user’s self and the celebrity image enhance the effectiveness of the advertisement (Lee et al., 2022) and improves the self-brand connections (Kwon and Ha, 2023). Furthermore, the literature findings support the notion that the better the appearance of influencers in mobile advertisements with graphics and animations, the better the customers find the actual or ideal congruence (SIC) between themselves and influencers (Xiao et al., 2021; Zogaj et al., 2021; Malär et al., 2011), leading to positive inspirations toward mobile ads. Thus, based on that literature, the combined effect of both the SA and SIC (organism) might be greater than the effect through SA or SIC alone. Hence, this leads to the following hypothesis:
Source appearance and self-influencer congruence positively mediate the relationship between visual content and customer engagement.
2.5 Conceptual framework
The measurement model is based on the SOR framework (Mehrabian and Russell, 1974) (Figure 1), which asserts that the VC is effective in influencing SA and SIC. The SOR theory states that the distinct characteristics of the environment serve as stimuli that affect the psychological state of the individuals and motivate them to respond behaviorally (Jacoby, 2002). Previous literature has used the SOR framework in the context of online purchase intention (Zhu et al., 2020; Suparno, 2020), customer response (Chopdar and Balakrishnan, 2020), customer buying behaviour during live streaming (Ming et al., 2021), customer revenge buying (Liu et al., 2023b), CE due to apps’ attributes (Tak and Gupta, 2021) and online product video evaluations (Agrawal and Mittal, 2022). Despite that, the SOR framework’s role in measuring CE with mobile advertising is still unexplored (Liu et al., 2023a). Moreover, a need exists to better recognize the influence of VC as a stimulus in generating CE toward mobile advertising through the SA and SIC as organisms.
The following model illustrates the hypothesized relations between the variables.
3. Methodology
This study uses a quantitative approach and deductive reasoning to test the proposed hypotheses based on the SOR theory. The positivist research paradigm referred by Qin (2021) was also used for data collection and analysis, which helped analyze a large number of population and identify causal linkages between variables. Due to time constraints, and model complexity, a cross-sectional approach was feasible for the mediation analysis (Cain et al., 2018) in the mobile advertising context (Shrout, 2011; MacKinnon, 2012).
3.1 Sample
The non-probability purposive sampling technique was used to collect the data from the mobile users of major cities of Pakistan. The questionnaire was distributed through Google Forms, where the progress bar was also used, and it was ensured that one must answer a question before moving toward the next question. A total of 783 responses were received ,out of which a usable sample of 722 was retained. Furthermore, 48 respondents were screened out based on their systematic patterns and straight-line responses (Abbey and Meloy, 2017). Also, 13 respondents were excluded for being multivariate outliers based on Mahalanobis distance (Ghorbani, 2019). Male and female participants were 58% and 42%, respectively, and the average age of the respondents was 24.50 years.
3.2 Instruments and measures
VC was operationalized through five items, adapted from Buil et al. (2013a, 2013b), Raji et al. (2019) and Bronner and Neijens (2006). In addition, similarity, likability and familiarity were measured through five items adapted from Chang (2011), Reysen (2005), Radu et al. (2023) and Wotruba et al. (2001). Based on the source attractiveness theory, these items accounted for the SA in the mobile advertisement context (Samarasinghe, 2018). SIC was measured through four items adapted from Malär et al. (2011) and Sirgy et al. (1997), which define ideal and actual SIC. Likewise, CE was measured through six items adapted from Harrigan et al. (2017), which included identification, interaction and absorption. In the context of mobile advertising, all scales for each of the four constructs were modified and measured using a seven-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Additionally, demographic variables to characterize the sample were introduced to the instrument.
4. Data analysis and results
This research estimated the mediation Model 6 of Hayes’ (2017) PROCESS macro. The robustness of the outer model was evaluated, and all elements with factor loadings were above the acceptable cutoff of 0.3 (Karjaluoto, 2007; Field, 2013). This led to an outer model (Table 1) with factor loadings that varied from 0.403 to 0.677. Similarly, for each construct in the model, average variance extracted (AVE), composite reliability (CR) and Cronbach’s alpha were generated. The findings showed that the AVE equal to 0.4 is acceptable if the value of the CR is more than 0.6 (Hair et al., 2021). The levels of AVE (0.400 to 0.616) and CR (0.639 to 0.791) are above 0.4 and 0.6, respectively, confirming the constructs’ validity. Significantly, Cronbach’s alpha (α) values of scale statistics indicate reliable results as alpha value is above the cutoff value of 0.6 (Murphy and Davidshofer, 1988). Thus, convergent validity was established on the basis of permissible levels of factor loadings and AVEs (Table 1). In addition, the result of Harman’s single-factor test indicates that a single factor accounted for only 25% of the variance, confirming that the data are free of common variance bias (Podsakoff et al., 2003). Furthermore, construct reliability was determined using acceptable reliability measures (Table 1).
KMO and Bartlett’s test of sphericity were used as additional testing of the outer model’s robustness, which define that the KMO value (0.845) defines a degree of common variance as “Meritorious” and the significance value (0.000) of Bartlett’s test, less than the threshold value (0.05) indicates the factor analysis is helpful and the sample is adequate (Beavers et al., 2013). Likewise, the level of robustness was also measured through correlation analysis, which aims to check the distribution effects or the linear relationship between two independent variables, which is between +1 and −1 (Ratner, 2009). The results, i.e. 0.243 is between 0 and 0.3, which indicates a weak positive linear relationship according to the shaky linear rule, and according to the fuzz-firm linear rule, 0.461 is between 0.3 and 0.7, which shows a moderate positive linear relationship (Table 3). In addition, the heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio confirms the discriminant validity of the construct because all the values analyzed from our results (Table 2) are below the threshold defined by Kline (2011), i.e. 0.85.
The results from the mediation model analysis showed that the VC, SA and SIC explained 26% of the variance observed in CE. This level of R2 is appropriate because “values of 0.20 are regarded as high in fields such as consumer behaviour” (Hair et al., 2021). Three hypotheses were supported, and one was not. Hence, VC (β = 0.0632; p ≥ 0.05; t < 2) does not directly affect the CE, which rejects H1. On the other hand, VC (β = 0.1058; p ≤ 0.05; t > 2) and SA (β = 0.6152; p ≤ 0.01; t > 2) were positively associated with the SIC (Table 4). Similarly, SA (β = 0.2257; p ≤ 0.01; t > 2) and SIC (β = 0.3140; p ≤ 0.01; t > 2) were positively associated with CE (Table 3). Significantly, mediation effects of the measurement model, which is central to our study, showed that the effect of VC on CE was mediated by SA (β = 0.0938; significant), which lends support to H2. The effect of VC on CE was mediated by SIC (β = 0.0332; significant), which supports H3. In addition, the serial mediation of SA and SIC (β = 0.0803, significant) generates positive associations between VC and CE; thus, H4 was also supported (Table 4).
5. Discussion
The findings from the measurement model showed that VC had a non-significant impact on CE. By contrast, VC was positively associated with SA and SIC. Notably, the VC’s effect on CE was sequentially and partially mediated by SA and SIC. The results confirm that the mediation through SA is three times greater than the SIC.
The result of the relationship between the VC and CE suggests that VC alone does not generate CE in the mobile advertising context. This contradicts the finding of Zhao et al. (2023) that image richness correlates positively with engagement and negates Rahman et al. (2022), who suggested that videos receive more views than pictures of people and pictures without people. Notably, the SA as well as the mobile user’s congruence with themselves and the influencer, are likely to generate engagement with the mobile ads. The VC’s impact is linked with increasing levels of favorable sentiments, and beautiful endorsers are more likely to lead to purchasing aspirations and engagement with that mobile ad (Samarasinghe, 2018; Lee et al., 2018). Similarly, visually attractive influencers in advertising are more likely to be perceived as credible and trustworthy, leading to more positive attitudes toward the product being advertised (Kim and Kim, 2021; Samarasinghe, 2018). However, mobile users do not engage with the ads shown on their devices that have visuals but do not have a source containing attractive appearance.
The most important finding of this study is that people notice the attractiveness of the influencer during the first impression of the mobile ads, and if it attracts them enough, then they start finding similarities between themselves and the influencers. The better the appearance of influencers in mobile advertisements, the better customers can find the actual or ideal congruence (SIC) between themselves and the influencers (Xiao et al., 2021; Zogaj et al., 2021; Malär et al., 2011). Besides this, visually appealing content and sources with strong SIC can boost CE, establish trust and credibility and eventually boost company’s sales and revenue (Anas et al., 2023; Hollebeek et al., 2022). Similarly, Lee and Watkins (2016) highlight that attractive and similar-looking models were more successful at eliciting favorable attitudes and purchase intentions.
6. Conclusion
Companies allocate a significant portion of their marketing budgets to mobile advertising in a digital environment where mobile phone usage is growing. To engage mobile users with the ads and reduce skepticism, the brands should make the advertisements more fascinating and appealing. In this regard, the brands should use appealing visuals by emphasizing SA and SIC in its mobile advertisements, which ultimately influence the company’s overall sales, reputation and return. Without these elements, an advertisement may be inexpensive, but the brand might lose its significance. The study concludes that attractive visuals solely will not affect a mobile user’s receptivity to advertisement, but rather SA and SIC. In addition, the SA and attractive visuals in mobile advertisements attract more users. Hence, the direct effect, as well as partial and sequential mediation effects of VC on CE via SA as well as SIC were investigated in this study.
7. Implications
7.1 Theoretical implications
The findings of this study extend the applicability of the SOR framework (Mehrabian and Russell, 1974) in understanding how mobile users are attracted to visuals with appealing sources and find similarities between themselves and influencers, allowing them to interact with advertisements displayed on their mobile devices. The findings of this study also expand the extant literature (Chopdar and Balakrishnan, 2020; Suparno, 2020; Zhu et al., 2020; Tak and Gupta, 2021) and support the SOR framework’s assertion that the stimulus (VC) is effective in influencing organisms (SA, SIC), which are in turn useful for predicting the response (CE) of mobile users toward advertisement. Likewise, the findings specify the significance of SA and SIC for the academics in the context of mobile advertising.
Moreover, the findings of our study also extend the literature on CE (e.g. Barari et al., 2021; Rosado-Pinto and Loureiro, 2020; Zheng et al., 2022; Hampton et al., 2022; Khan et al., 2023) by assessing it in the context of mobile advertising. This study supports a growing body of literature in the field that focuses on how advertisers can effectively increase customer’s mobile advertising engagement by employing attractive sources and ensuring SIC in the ads (Adeline et al., 2023; Roth-Cohen et al., 2022).
7.2 Managerial implications
The current study can assist businesses and public managers in achieving success on the mobile advertising platforms. First, our results prove that the looks of the source allow mobile users to admire the influencers and have a positive influence on themselves. Advertising professionals should note that the appealing looks of the source in the mobile ads engage users by driving positive associations and, consequently customer satisfaction with the brand (Huang, 2016; Shen et al., 2022). Second, the mediating effect of SIC on CE, however small, suggests that using a similar influencer as the target audience, based on the demographics or ideas, can be likable. This creates a positive image regarding the influencer’s credibility and authenticity, and ultimately leads to mobile advertisement engagement. This finding is in line with the previous literature, which suggests that the ideal and actual congruence between the user and the celebrity strengthens the self-brand relationships (Kwon and Ha, 2023). Therefore, professional’s source selection should be based on the target audience’s traits and likability.
Not only that, the previous research has highlighted the role of actual and ideal SIC (Xu and Pratt, 2018) toward enhancing content engagement and purchase intention (Shan et al., 2020; Zogaj et al., 2021), which also reflects in our findings. However, a notable contribution of our study is the role of both the SA and SIC in enhancing CE toward advertising on mobile platforms. The serial mediation effect of SA and SIC (β = 0.0803) on CE is far greater than that of SIC (β = 0.0332), which shows that likeable and attractive sources are likely to induce higher SIC and subsequent CE. Advertising professionals should know that without SA and SIC, mobile users skip the ads by perceiving mobile ads to be irritating or interruptive. Significantly, the effectiveness of this advertising platform is comparatively higher than the others (Nguyen et al., 2020; Rurianto et al., 2022). Thus, advertisers should know the significance of the source’s appearance in the mobile ads for more effective outcomes and to minimize the advertising skepticism behaviour of mobile users.
Table 5 summarizes the study conclusion and implications.
8. Limitations and future research directions
First, our study has gathered data based on the surveys from the mobile users rather than to observe the preferences of the mobile users based on demographic factors (e.g. gender, age, etc.). Future research may examine the level of involvement and preferences of mobile users with the advertisement.
Second, our study gathered data based on the national brand’s advertisement perceptions in the customer’s mind. Future research should investigate the impact that various international and regional brands commercials have on the levels of engagement that customers have with advertising because international brands have more significant influence, trust and value than local brands.
Finally, there are various factors, including humor (Plessen et al., 2020), advertising picture quality (Shehu et al., 2021), the portrayal of influencers, etc., that influence the advertising engagement behaviour of mobile users. While our research uses mainly SA and SIC to examine the customer advertising engagement of the mobile users, future research should consider humor, picture quality and portrayal of influencers to identify the CE in the mobile advertising context.
Figures
Scale refinement
Measurement items | Factor loadings |
---|---|
VC Adapted from Buil et al. (2013a, 2013b), Raji et al. (2019) and Bronner and Neijens (2006) α = 0.703; CR = 0.726; AVE = 0.466 |
|
The VC in mobile advertisements offered me something new about products | 0.443 |
The VC in mobile advertisements gives me useful information about the product features | 0.651 |
The VC in mobile advertisements is creative | 0.516 |
The VC in mobile advertisements gave me credible information about the product | 0.602 |
The VC in mobile advertisements about the product is original | 0.677 |
SA Adapted from Chang (2011), Reysen (2005), Radu et al. (202) and Wotruba et al. (2001) α = 0.624; CR = 0.639; AVE = 0.400 |
|
The source is similar to me | 0.424 |
The source in the mobile advertisement is sincere | 0.587 |
The source in the mobile advertisement is likable | 0.630 |
This source in the mobile advertisement is physically attractive | 0.554 |
I am very familiar with the source in the mobile advertisement | 0.435 |
SIC Adapted from Malär et al. (2011) and Sirgy et al. (1997) α = 0.790; CR = 0.791; AVE = 0.616 |
|
The person in the mobile advertisement is consistent with how I see myself | 0.492 |
The person in the mobile advertisement is a mirror image of me | 0.650 |
The person in the mobile advertisement is consistent with how I would like to be | 0.670 |
The person in the mobile advertisement is a mirror image of the person I would like to be | 0.672 |
CE Adapted from Harrigan et al. (2017) α = 0.754; CR = 0.762; AVE = 0.453 |
|
When someone criticizes a mobile advertisement, it feels like a personal insult | 0.407 |
When someone praises a mobile advertisement, it feels like a personal compliment | 0.457 |
In general, I like to get involved in mobile advertisement-related community discussions | 0.403 |
Anything related to mobile advertisements grabs my attention | 0.511 |
When I am interacting with the mobile advertisement, I forget everything else around me | 0.590 |
In my interaction with the mobile advertisement, I am immersed | 0.636 |
Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio and correlations
Constructs interaction | Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio (HTMT) | Correlation |
---|---|---|
SA ↔ CE | 0.554 | 0.380** |
SIC ↔ CE | 0.620 | 0.478** |
SIC ↔ SA | 0.635 | 0.448** |
VC ↔ CE | 0.354 | 0.243** |
VC ↔ SA | 0.700 | 0.461** |
VC ↔ SIC | 0.361 | 0.268** |
**Correlation significance <0.001
Model coefficients
Constructs | β | Standardized coefficient | SE | t | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Effect on SA, R² = 0.2123 | |||||
VC | 0.4157 | 0.4608 | 0.0298 | 13.9300 | 0.0000* |
Effect on SIC, R² = 0.2055 | |||||
VC | 0.1058 | 0.0785 | 0.0505 | 2.0959 | 0.0364** |
SA | 0.6152 | 0.4118 | 0.0560 | 10.9942 | 0.0000* |
Effect on CE, R² = 0.2657 | |||||
VC | 0.0632 | 0.0569 | 0.0401 | 1.5732 | 0.1161 |
SA | 0.2257 | 0.1833 | 0.0480 | 4.7059 | 0.0000* |
SIC | 0.3140 | 0.3810 | 0.0296 | 10.6183 | 0.0000* |
*p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05
Mediation effects
Hypothesis | Effects | Coefficient | SE | t | p | Type of mediation | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | VC → CE | 0.0632 | 0.0401 | 1.5732 | 0.1161 | Null | |
H2 | VC → SA → CE | 0.0938 | Partial | ||||
H3 | VC → SIC → CE | 0.0332 | Partial | ||||
H4 | VC → SA → SIC → CE | 0.0803 | Sequential | ||||
Total indirect effect | 0.2073 |
VC = Visual content; SA = source appearance; SIC = self-influencer congruence; CE = customer engagement
Conclusion and theoretical and managerial implications
Conclusion | Theoretical and managerial implications |
---|---|
SA with attractive visuals enhances mobile users’ receptivity to advertisement | The appearance of the source in the mobile ads engages users by driving positive associations, which results in customer satisfaction |
Ideal and actual congruence between the user’s self and the celebrity image strengthens the self-brand relationships and the efficacy of the ads | Using a similar influencer as the target audience creates a positive image regarding the influencer’s credibility and authenticity, which suggests professionals may select sources based on the target audience’s traits and likability |
Likeable and attractive sources along with VC allow CE with the mobile ads | SA and SIC minimize the skepticism toward mobile ads. Professionals should understand that visuals alone cannot engage users, and SA is more influential than SIC in attracting mobile users through ads |
References
Abbey, J.D. and Meloy, M.G. (2017), “Attention by design: Using attention checks to detect inattentive respondents and improve data quality”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 53-56 No. 1, pp. 63-70.
Absharina, Z.B., Yuriani, A.D. and Hendriana, E. (2021), “The effectiveness of fashion influencers in influencing the purchase interest of millennial generation consumers in Indonesia”, Journal of Business and Management Studies, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 152-161.
Adeline, B.I., Kay, H.N.N., Tan, G.W.H., Lo, P.S., Chaw, L.Y. and Ooi, K.B. (2023), “A relook at the mobile advertising landscape: What are the new consumer expectations in the retailing industry?”, Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 79, p. 101953.
Aggad, K.K., Ahmad, F.S. and Kamarudin, S. (2021), “Investigating the impact of influencers’, characteristics, contents, and trustworthiness on consumers’ purchase intention”, Review of International Geographical Education Online, Vol. 11 No. 6.
Agrawal, S.R. and Mittal, D. (2022), “Optimizing customer engagement content strategy in retail and E-tail: available on online product review videos”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 67, p. 102966.
Ahmadi, I., Waltenrath, A. and Janze, C. (2023), “Congruency and users’ sharing on social media platforms: a novel approach for analyzing content”, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 52 No. 3, pp. 369-386.
Almela-Baeza, J., Guercetti, J. and Febrero, B. (2023), “The importance of engagement in the dissemination of audio-visual content by Spanish health influencers on Instagram”, Social Sciences, Vol. 12 No. 4, p. 220.
Anas, A.M., Abdou, A.H., Hassan, T.H., Alrefae, W.M.M., Daradkeh, F.M., El-Amin, M.A.M.M., Kegour, A.B.A. and Alboray, H.M.M. (2023), “Satisfaction on the driving seat: exploring the influence of social media marketing activities on followers’ purchase intention in the restaurant industry context”, Sustainability, Vol. 15 No. 9, p. 7207.
Appel, G., Grewal, L., Hadi, R. and Stephen, A.T. (2020), “The future of social media in marketing”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 48 No. 1, pp. 79-95.
Bandura, A. (1999), “Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective”, Asian Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 21-41.
Barari, M., Ross, M., Thaichon, S. and Surachartkumtonkun, J. (2021), “A meta‐analysis of customer engagement behaviour”, International Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 45 No. 4, pp. 457-477.
Barta, S., Gurrea, R. and Flavián, C. (2023), “Telepresence in live-stream shopping: an experimental study comparing Instagram and the metaverse”, Electronic Markets, Vol. 33 No. 1, p. 29.
Bazi, S., Filieri, R. and Gorton, M. (2023), “Social media content aesthetic quality and customer engagement: the mediating role of entertainment and impacts on brand love and loyalty”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 160, p. 113778.
Beavers, A.S., Lounsbury, J.W., Richards, J.K., Huck, S.W., Skolits, G.J. and Esquivel, S.L. (2013), “Practical considerations for using exploratory factor analysis in educational research”, Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, Vol. 18 No. 1, p. 6.
Belanche, D., Flavián, C. and Pérez-Rueda, A. (2017), “User adaptation to interactive advertising formats: the effect of previous exposure, habit and time urgency on ad skipping behaviors”, Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 34 No. 7, pp. 961-972.
Belch, G.E. and Belch, M.A. (2021), Advertising and Promotion: An Integrated Marketing Communications Perspective 12th, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Brengman, M., Willems, K. and De Gauquier, L. (2022), “Customer engagement in multi-sensory virtual reality advertising: the effect of sound and scent congruence”, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 13, p. 747456.
Bronner, F. and Neijens, P. (2006), “Audience experiences of media context and embedded advertising: a comparison of eight media”, International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 48 No. 1, pp. 81-100.
Buil, I., De Chernatony, L. and Martínez, E. (2013a), “Examining the role of advertising and sales promotions in brand equity creation”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 66 No. 1, pp. 115-122.
Buil, I., Martínez, E. and De Chernatony, L. (2013b), “The influence of brand equity on consumer responses”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 62-74.
Cain, M.K., Zhang, Z. and Bergeman, C.S. (2018), “Time and other considerations in mediation design”, Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 78 No. 6, pp. 952-972.
Casaló, L.V., Flavián, C. and Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. (2020), “Influencers on Instagram: antecedents and consequences of opinion leadership”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 117, pp. 510-519.
Chang, C. (2011), “Opinions from others like you: the role of perceived source similarity”, Media Psychology, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 415-441.
Chopdar, P.K. and Balakrishnan, J. (2020), “Consumers response towards mobile commerce applications: SOR approach”, International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 53, p. 102106.
Cvirka, D., Rudienė, E. and Morkūnas, M. (2022), “Investigation of attributes influencing the attractiveness of mobile commerce advertisements on the Facebook platform”, Economies, Vol. 10 No. 2, p. 52.
de Oliveira Santini, F., Ladeira, W.J., Pinto, D.C., Herter, M.M., Sampaio, C.H. and Babin, B.J. (2020), “Customer engagement in social media: a framework and meta-analysis”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 48 No. 6, pp. 1211-1228.
de Sio, S., Zamagni, A., Casu, G. and Gremigni, P. (2022), “Green trust as a mediator in the relationship between green advertising skepticism, environmental knowledge, and intention to buy green food”, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 19 No. 24, p. 16757.
Field, A. (2013), Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics, Sage Publication, available at: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=c0Wk9IuBmAoC&oi=fnd&pg=PP2&dq=Field,+A.+(2013),+Discovering+Statistics+Using+IBM+SPSS+Statistics,+Sage.&ots=LdzhLOWz0G&sig=pmaagwpyIaAqIxm1hTMo47nY8bA
Flavián, C., Gurrea, R. and Orús, C. (2017), “The influence of online product presentation videos on persuasion and purchase channel preference: the role of imagery fluency and need for touch”, Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 34 No. 8, pp. 1544-1556.
Galoni, C., Carpenter, G.S. and Rao, H. (Eds) (2020), “In a pandemic, We buy what We know”, Harvard Business Review, available at: https://hbr.org/2020/11/in-a-pandemic-we-buywhat-we-know
Gao, S. and Zang, Z. (2016), “An empirical examination of users’ adoption of mobile advertising in China”, Information Development, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 203-215.
Ghorbani, H. (2019), “Mahalanobis distance and its application for detecting multivariate outliers”, Facta Universitatis, Series: Mathematics and Informatics, pp. 583-595.
Hair, J.F. Jr., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M. (2021), A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), Sage publications, available at: https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/96122/
Hampton, H., Foley, A., Del Rio, D.F., Smyth, B., Laverty, D. and Caulfield, B. (2022), “Customer engagement strategies in retail electricity markets: a comprehensive and comparative review”, Energy Research and Social Science, Vol. 90, p. 102611.
Hanaysha, J.R. (2022), “Impact of social media marketing features on consumer’s purchase decision in the fast-food industry: brand trust as a mediator”, International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, Vol. 2 No. 2, p. 100102.
Harrigan, P., Evers, U., Miles, M. and Daly, T. (2017), “Customer engagement with tourism social media brands”, Tourism Management, Vol. 59, pp. 597-609.
Hashim, N.H., Normalini. and Sajali, N. (2018), “The influence factors towards mobile advertising message content on consumer purchase intention”, Global Business Review, Vol. 19 No. 5, pp. 1187-1206.
Hatmaker, T. (2021), “Twitter is testing better image previews and fewer cropped photos”, available at: https://techcrunch.com/2021/03/10/twitter-cropped-image-previews-test/
Hayes, A.F. (2017), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, Guilford publications, available at: www.guilford.com/books/Introduction-to-Mediation-Moderation-and-Conditional-Process-Analysis/Andrew-Hayes/9781462549030
Hollebeek, L.D., Sharma, T.G., Pandey, R., Sanyal, P. and Clark, M.K. (2022), “Fifteen years of customer engagement research: a bibliometric and network analysis”, Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 293-309.
Hou, L. and Pan, X. (2023), “Aesthetics of hotel photos and its impact on consumer engagement: a computer vision approach”, Tourism Management, Vol. 94, p. 104653.
Huang, G. (2016), “Moderating role of brand familiarity in cross-media effects: an information processing perspective”, Journal of Promotion Management, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 665-683.
Jacoby, J. (2002), “Stimulus‐organism‐response reconsidered: an evolutionary step in modeling (consumer) behavior”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 51-57.
Jamil, R.A., Qayyum, A. and Lodhi, M.S. (2022), “Skepticism toward online advertising: causes, consequences, and remedial moderators”, International Journal of Online Marketing, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 1-21.
Karjaluoto, H. (2007), “SPSS opas markkinatutkijoille (No. 344)”, Jyväskylän yliopisto.
Karjaluoto, H. and Alatalo, T. (2007), “Consumers’ attitudes towards and intention to participate in mobile marketing”, International Journal of Services Technology and Management, Vol. 8 No. 2/3, pp. 155-173.
Ketter, E. and Avraham, E. (2021), “# StayHome today so we can# TravelTomorrow: tourism destinations’ digital marketing strategies during the covid-19 pandemic”, Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, Vol. 38 No. 8, pp. 819-832.
Khan, I., Hollebeek, L.D., Fatma, M., Islam, J.U., Rather, R.A., Shahid, S. and Sigurdsson, V. (2023), “Mobile app vs. desktop browser platforms: the relationships among customer engagement, experience, relationship quality and loyalty intention”, Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 39 Nos 3/4, pp. 275-297.
Kim, D.Y. and Kim, H.Y. (2021), “Trust me, trust me not: a nuanced view of influencer marketing on social media”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 134, pp. 223-232.
Kim, T. and Read, G.L. (2022), “Influencers’ smiles work regardless of product and message”, Marketing Intelligence and Planning, Vol. 40 No. 4, pp. 425-440.
Kim, H. and Park, M. (2023), “Virtual influencers’ attractiveness effect on purchase intention: a moderated mediation model of the product–endorser fit with the brand”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 143, p. 107703.
Kline, R.B. (2011), Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 3. Baskı, Vol. 14, Guilford, New York, NY, pp. 1497-1513.
Krause, K. (2017), “A framework for visual communication at nature”, Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 15-24.
Kumar, V. and Pansari, A. (2016), “Competitive advantage through engagement”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 53 No. 4, pp. 497-514.
Kurdi, B., Alshurideh, M., Akour, I., Tariq, E., AlHamad, A. and Alzoubi, H. (2022), “The effect of social media influencers’ characteristics on consumer intention and attitude toward keto products purchase intention”, International Journal of Data and Network Science, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 1135-1146.
Kwon, S. and Ha, S. (2023), “Examining identity-and bond-based hashtag community identification: the moderating role of self-brand connections”, Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 78-93.
Lee, J.E. and Watkins, B. (2016), “YouTube vloggers’ influence on consumer luxury brand perceptions and intentions”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 69 No. 12, pp. 5753-5760.
Lee, D., Hosanagar, K. and Nair, H.S. (2018), “Advertising content and consumer engagement on social media: evidence from Facebook”, Management Science, Vol. 64 No. 11, pp. 5105-5131.
Lee, J.S., Chang, H. and Zhang, L. (2022), “An integrated model of congruence and credibility in celebrity endorsement”, International Journal of Advertising, Vol. 41 No. 7, pp. 1358-1381.
Li, M.W., Teng, H.Y. and Chen, C.Y. (2020), “Unlocking the customer engagement-brand loyalty relationship in tourism social media: the roles of brand attachment and customer trust”, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Vol. 44, pp. 184-192.
Liu, H., Feng, S. and Hu, X.S. (2022), “Process vs. outcome: effects of food photo types in online restaurant reviews on consumers’ purchase intention”, International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 102, p. 103179.
Liu, Y., Cai, L., Ma, F. and Wang, X. (2023a), “Revenge buying after the lockdown: based on the SOR framework and TPB model”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 72, p. 103263.
Liu, Y., Li, Q., Edu, T., Fam, K.S., Zaharia, R. and Negricea, C. (2023b), “Mobile social commerce content, consumer emotions and behaviour”, International Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 47 No. 4.
Lou, C. and Yuan, S. (2019), “Influencer marketing: how message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media”, Journal of Interactive Advertising, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 58-73.
McGuire, W.J. (1985), “Chapter attitudes and attitude change”, Handbook of Social Psychology, McGraw-Hill, pp. 233-346.
MacKinnon, D. (2012), Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis, Routledge, available at: www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780203809556/introduction-statistical-mediation-analysis-david-mackinnon
Malär, L., Krohmer, H., Hoyer, W.D. and Nyffenegger, B. (2011), “Emotional brand attachment and brand personality: the relative importance of the actual and the ideal self”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 75 No. 4, pp. 35-52.
Mayahi, S. and Vidrih, M. (2022), “The impact of generative ai on the future of visual content marketing”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.12660.
Mehrabian, A. and Russell, J.A. (1974), An Approach to Environmental Psychology, American Psychological Association, available at: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1974-22049-000
Ming, J., Jianqiu, Z., Bilal, M., Akram, U. and Fan, M. (2021), “How social presence influences impulse buying behavior in live streaming commerce? The role of SOR theory”, International Journal of Web Information Systems, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 300-320.
Moorthy, V., Kiran, P., Banerjee, J. and SV, K.K. (2022), “Investigating the impact of emotional contagion on customer attitude, trust and brand engagement: a social commerce perspective”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 99-118.
Mukherjee, A., Vander Meer, D. and Dutta, K. (2023), “Domain-independent real-time service provisioning in digital platforms: featuring bundling and customer time-preference”, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 167, p. 113927.
Murillo-Zegarra, M., Ruiz-Mafe, C. and Sanz-Blas, S. (2020), “The effects of mobile advertising alerts and perceived value on continuance intention for branded mobile apps”, Sustainability, Vol. 12 No. 17, p. 6753.
Murphy, K.R. and Davidshofer, C.O. (1988), “Psychological testing”, Principles, and Applications, Vol. 18, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Nelson, M.R., Ham, C.D. and Haley, E. (2021), “What do We know about political advertising? Not much! political persuasion knowledge and advertising skepticism in the United States”, Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, Vol. 42 No. 4, pp. 329-353.
Nguyen, N.T., Zuniga, A., Lee, H., Hui, P., Flores, H. and Nurmi, P. (2020), (“m) ad to see me? intelligent advertisement placement: Balancing user annoyance and advertising effectiveness”, Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 1-26.
Nugroho, S.D.P., Rahayu, M. and Hapsari, R.D.V. (2022), “The impacts of social media influencer’s credibility attributes on gen Z purchase intention with brand image as mediation: Study on consumers of Korea cosmetic product”, International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 2147-4478), Vol. 11 No. 5, pp. 18-32.
Orús, C., Gurrea, R. and Flavián, C. (2017), “Facilitating imaginations through online product presentation videos: effects on imagery fluency, product attitude and purchase intention”, Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 661-700.
Pansari, A. and Kumar, V. (2017), “Customer engagement: the construct, antecedents, and consequences”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 45 No. 3, pp. 294-311.
Park, S.S. and Park, B. (2020), “Advertising on mobile apps versus the mobile web: Which delivers better advertisement recognition and willingness to buy?”, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 60 No. 4, pp. 381-393.
Park, Y.N. and Gong, T. (2023), “Curvilinear relationship between customer engagement and responses to service failures”, The Service Industries Journal, pp. 1-27.
Peetz, T.B. (2012), “Celebrity athlete endorser effectiveness: construction and validation of a scale”.
Pieters, R. and Wedel, M. (2004), “Attention capture and transfer in advertising: brand, pictorial, and text-size effects”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 68 No. 2, pp. 36-50.
Pieters, R. and Wedel, M. (2007), “Goal control of attention to advertising: the Yarbus implication”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 34 No. 2, pp. 224-233.
Plessen, C.Y., Franken, F.R., Ster, C., Schmid, R.R., Wolfmayr, C., Mayer, A.M., Sobisch, M., Kathofer, M., Rattner, K., Kotlyar, E. and Maierwieser, R.J. (2020), “Humor styles and personality: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the relations between humor styles and the big five personality traits”, Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 154, p. 109676.
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y. and Podsakoff, N.P. (2003), “Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88 No. 5, p. 879.
Priyankara, R., Weerasiri, S., Dissanayaka, R. and Jinadasa, M. (2017), “Celebrity endorsement and consumer buying intention with relation to the television advertisement for perfumes”, Management Studies, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 128-148.
Qin, X. (2021), “Intelligent technologies and methodological transformations in the social sciences”, Chinese Political Science Review, pp. 1-17.
Radu, A., Quach, S., Thaichon, P., Surachartkumtonkun, J. and Weaven, S. (2023), “Relationship outcomes following a service failure: the role of agent likability”, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 364-379.
Rahi, S., Ammara, U.E. and Qazi, T.F. (2021), “The impact of advertisement on customer loyalty with mediating role of word of mouth (WOM)”, Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings, pp. 224-229.
Rahman, W.N.A., Mutum, D.S. and Ghazali, E.M. (2022), “Consumer engagement with visual content on Instagram: impact of different features of posts by prominent brands”, International Journal of E-Services and Mobile Applications (IJESMA), Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 1-21.
Raji, R.A., Rashid, S. and Ishak, S. (2019), “The mediating effect of brand image on the relationships between social media advertising content, sales promotion content and behavioural intention”, Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 302-330.
Ratner, B. (2009), “The correlation coefficient: its values range between+ 1/− 1, or do they?”, Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 139-142.
Reysen, S. (2005), “Construction of a new scale: the Reysen likability scale”, Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 201-208.
Rosado-Pinto, F. and Loureiro, S.M.C. (2020), “The growing complexity of customer engagement: a systematic review”, EuroMed Journal of Business, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 167-203.
Roth-Cohen, O., Rosenberg, H. and Lissitsa, S. (2022), “Are you talking to me? Generation X, Y, Z responses to mobile advertising”, Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 761-780.
Roy, S. (2006), “An exploratory study in celebrity endorsements”, Journal of Creative Communications, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 139-153.
Rurianto, J., Sumarwan, U., Suharjo, B. and Hasanah, N. (2022), “Mobile advertising modelling for telecommunications industry: focusing on the boosting of value co-creation”, Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 67-91.
Samarasinghe, H.M.U.S.R. (2018), “Moderating role of consumer’s gender on effectiveness of celebrity endorsement towards consumer’s purchasing intention”, Global Journal of Management and Business Research: EMarketing, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 1-11.
Sanders, T. (2006), The Likeability Factor: How to Boost Your L-Factor and Achieve Your Life’s Dreams, Crown Currency, available at: www.amazon.com/Likeability-Factor-L-Factor-Achieve-Dreams/dp/1400080509
Schunk, D.H. and DiBenedetto, M.K. (2020), “Motivation and social cognitive theory”, Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 60, p. 101832.
Shan, Y., Chen, K.J. and Lin, J.S. (2020), “When social media influencers endorse brands: the effects of self-influencer congruence, parasocial identification, and perceived endorser motive”, International Journal of Advertising, Vol. 39 No. 5, pp. 590-610.
Sharma, S. and Bumb, A. (2022), “Femluencing: Integration of femvertising and influencer marketing on social media”, Journal of Interactive Advertising, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 95-111.
Sharma, P., Sadh, A., Billore, A. and Motiani, M. (2022), “Investigating brand community engagement and evangelistic tendencies on social media”, Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 16-28.
Shehu, E., Abou Nabout, N. and Clement, M. (2021), “The risk of programmatic advertising: effects of website quality on advertising effectiveness”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 663-677.
Shen, Y.C., Lin, H.Y., Chou, C.Y., Wu, P.H. and Yang, W.H. (2022), “‘Yes, I know you’: the role of source familiarity in the relationship between service adaptive behavior and customer satisfaction”, Journal of Service Theory and Practice, Vol. 32 No. 5, pp. 620-639.
Shrout, P. (2011), “Integrating causal analysis into psychopathology research”, Causality and Psychopathology: Finding the Determinants of Disorders and Their Cures, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 3-24.
Sirgy, M.J. (1982), “Self-concept in consumer behavior: a critical review”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 287-300.
Sirgy, M.J., Grewal, D., Mangleburg, T.F., Park, J.O., Chon, K.S., Claiborne, C.B., Johar, J.S. and Berkman, H. (1997), “Assessing the predictive validity of two methods of measuring self-image congruence”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 229-241.
So, K.K.F., King, C. and Sparks, B. (2014), “Customer engagement with tourism brands: scale development and validation”, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 304-329.
Song, Y., Wei (David) Phang, C., Yang, S. and Luo, X. (2018), “The effectiveness of contextual competitive targeting in conjunction with promotional incentives”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 349-385.
Spina, F. (2020), “Game design, game marketing, game monetization, games analytics”, available at: https://deltadna.com/blog/rewarded-video-ads-in-mobile-games/
Statista (2023), “Mobile advertising spending worldwide 2007–2024”, available at: www.statista.com/statistics/303817/mobile-internet-advertising-revenue-worldwide/#:∼:text=In%202022%2C%20mobile%20advertising%20spending,nearly%20399.6%20billion%20by%202024
Stefko, R., Bacik, R., Fedorko, R. and Olearova, M. (2022), “Gender-generation characteristic in relation to the customer behavior and purchasing process in terms of mobile marketing”, Oeconomia Copernicana, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 181-223.
Suparno, C. (2020), “Online purchase intention of halal cosmetics: SOR framework application”, Journal of Islamic Marketing, Vol. 12 No. 9, pp. 1665-1681.
Tak, P. and Gupta, M. (2021), “Examining travel mobile app attributes and its impact on consumer engagement: an application of SOR framework”, Journal of Internet Commerce, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 293-318.
Teng, H.Y. and Tsai, C.H. (2020), “Can tour leader likability enhance tourist value co-creation behaviors? The role of attachment”, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Vol. 45, pp. 285-294.
Van Doorn, J., Lemon, K.N., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P. and Verhoef, P.C. (2010), “Customer engagement behavior: Theoretical foundations and research directions”, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 253-266.
Villarroel Ordenes, F., Grewal, D., Ludwig, S., Ruyter, K.D., Mahr, D. and Wetzels, M. (2019), “Cutting through content clutter: how speech and image acts drive consumer sharing of social media brand messages”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 45 No. 5, pp. 988-1012.
Weismueller, J., Harrigan, P., Wang, S. and Soutar, G.N. (2020), “Influencer endorsements: How advertising disclosure and source credibility affect consumer purchase intention on social media”, Australasian Marketing Journal, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 160-170.
Wiedmann, K.P. and Von Mettenheim, W. (2020), “Attractiveness, trustworthiness and expertise–social influencers’ winning formula?”, Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol. 30 No. 5, pp. 707-725.
Wies, S., Bleier, A. and Edeling, A. (2023), “Finding goldilocks influencers: how follower count drives social media engagement”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 87 No. 3, pp. 383-405.
Wotruba, T.R., Chonko, L.B. and Loe, T.W. (2001), “The impact of ethics code familiarity on manager behavior”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 59-69.
Xiao, L., Saleem, A., Tariq, S.M., Ul Haq, J. and Guo, M. (2021), “I wish i could be like her/him! how self-congruence stimulates a desire to mimic”, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 16 No. 7, pp. 3025-3042.
Xu, X. and Pratt, S. (2018), “Social media influencers as endorsers to promote travel destinations: an application of self-congruence theory to the Chinese generation Y”, Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, Vol. 35 No. 7, pp. 958-972.
Yang, J., Jiang, M. and Wu, L. (2021), “Native advertising in WeChat official accounts: how do ad–content congruence and ad skepticism influence advertising value and effectiveness?”, Journal of Interactive Advertising, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 17-33.
Yaprak, I. and Çoban, S. (2023), “The mediating role of hedonic buying behavior in the effect of consumers’ attitudes towards social media ads on impulse buying behavior”, Ege Academic Review, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 203-218.
Zhao, L., Zhang, M., Ming, Y., Niu, T. and Wang, Y. (2023), “The effect of image richness on customer engagement: evidence from Sina Weibo”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 154, p. 113307.
Zheng, R., Li, Z. and Na, S. (2022), “How customer engagement in the live-streaming affects purchase intention and customer acquisition, E-tailer’s perspective”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 68, p. 103015.
Zhu, X., Teng, L., Foti, L. and Yuan, Y. (2019), “Using self-congruence theory to explain the interaction effects of brand type and celebrity type on consumer attitude formation”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 103, pp. 301-309.
Zhu, L., Li, H., Wang, F.K., He, W. and Tian, Z. (2020), “How online reviews affect purchase intention: a new model based on the stimulus-organism-response (S-O-R) framework”, Aslib Journal of Information Management, Vol. 72 No. 4, pp. 463-488.
Zogaj, A., Tscheulin, D.K. and Olk, S. (2021), “Benefits of matching consumers’ personality: Creating perceived trustworthiness via actual self‐congruence and perceived competence via ideal self‐congruence”, Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 416-430.