To read this content please select one of the options below:

Drivers for design for deconstruction (DfD) implementation among design professionals

Hayford Pittri (Department of Construction Technology and Management, Building Science, Engineering and Materials Research Team, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana)
Kofi Agyekum (Department of Construction Technology and Management, Building Science, Engineering and Materials Research Team, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana)
Edward Ayebeng Botchway (Department of Architecture, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana)
João Alencastro (Department of Built Environment, School of Art, Design and Architecture, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK)
Olugbenga Timo Oladinrin (Department of Built Environment, Faculty of Arts, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK)
Annabel Morkporkpor Ami Dompey (Department of Construction Technology and Management, Building Science, Engineering and Materials Research Team, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana)

Smart and Sustainable Built Environment

ISSN: 2046-6099

Article publication date: 10 November 2023

Issue publication date: 4 September 2024

435

Abstract

Purpose

The design for deconstruction (DfD) technique, a contemporaneous solution to demolition by optimizing disassembly activities to enable reuse, has recently emerged with several promises to promote the circular economy. However, little attention has been given to its implementation among design professionals, especially in the Global South. Therefore, this study aims to explore the drivers for DfD implementation among design professionals in the Ghanaian construction industry (GCI).

Design/methodology/approach

The study adopted a mixed research approach (explanatory sequential design) with an initial quantitative instrument phase, followed by a qualitative data collection phase. Data from the survey were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, one-sample t-Test, and normalization value (NV) test after a review of pertinent literature. These data were then validated through semistructured interviews with ten design professionals with in-depth knowledge of DfD.

Findings

The findings revealed that although all ten drivers are important, the eight key drivers for the DfD implementation were identified as, in order of importance, “Availability of computer software applications regarding DfD,” “Inclusion of DfD in the formal education of design professionals,” “Increasing public awareness of the concept of DfD,” “Organizing workshops/seminars for design professionals on the concept of DfD,” “Availability of DfD training,” “Regulation regarding DfD,” “Industry guidance regarding DfD” and “Establishing a market for salvaged construction components.”

Originality/value

This study's findings provide insights into an under-investigated topic in Ghana and offer new and additional information and insights into the current state-of-the-art on the factors that drive DfD implementation.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Since submission of this article, the following author have updated their affiliation: Hayford Pittri is at the Institute for Sustainable Built Environment, School of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and Society, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.

Citation

Pittri, H., Agyekum, K., Botchway, E.A., Alencastro, J., Oladinrin, O.T. and Dompey, A.M.A. (2024), "Drivers for design for deconstruction (DfD) implementation among design professionals", Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. 13 No. 5, pp. 1134-1154. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-05-2023-0117

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles