Planning and design for sustainable cities in the MENA region

Cynthia Skelhorn (Department of Sustainability, Qatar Green Building Council, Doha, Qatar)

Smart and Sustainable Built Environment

ISSN: 2046-6099

Article publication date: 3 May 2019

Issue publication date: 3 May 2019

714

Citation

Skelhorn, C. (2019), "Planning and design for sustainable cities in the MENA region", Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 98-102. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-05-2019-071

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited


Planning and design for sustainable cities in the MENA region

Recent research indicates that many densely populated areas of the world will be uninhabitable in the coming century due to the depletion of resources, climate change and increasing urbanization. Climate change impacts, including rising temperatures, rising sea levels, increasing frequency of heat waves and extreme weather are already evident. Along with the challenges of climate change, the percentage of populations residing in urban areas is steadily increasing. In 2014, 54 percent of the world’s population lived in urban areas, and this is expected to rise to 66 percent by 2050, with the most rapid urbanization in Asia and Africa (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division, 2014). Climate change impacts on cities are yet to be fully understood, though a recognition that the interaction of social, infrastructure and ecosystems features can amplify impacts is consistent (Ramaswami et al., 2016).

With the high-profile withdrawal of the USA from the Paris climate agreement, cities are emerging as the political unit that will continue with the bulk of climate change governance initiatives in the USA. Bulkeley et al. (2012) note that the scale and nature of response at the municipal level have increased since the early 1990s. However, Bulkeley and Betsill (2003, p. i) argue that “the formation and implementation of local climate change policy has been limited by the resources and powers of local government, and by conflicts between economic and environmental objectives” (p. i). This particular combination of climate change impacts and urbanization pose serious planning and design challenges that need new insights, designs and approaches in order to improve the chances for survival of shelter, infrastructure, human and ecosystem health, biodiversity, etc. With human populations concentrated in urbanized areas, the chances for a single event or a single impact of climate change (e.g. an extreme weather event or rising sea levels) to affect greater populations are evident.

A recent study of future temperatures in Southwest Asia found that many cities in the region of the Arabian Gulf will become uninhabitable by 2,100 under current climate change projections (Pal and Eltahir, 2016), while a Lancet article detailed the population–environment–development dynamics that require an urgent focus on survivability for the Arab world (El-Zein et al., 2014). In the Middle East North Africa region, for example, many cities already experience temperature and humidity maximums that make it difficult to find acceptable levels of comfort outdoors during most of the day in Summer, and during midday in temperate seasons, such as spring and autumn. As an example of one country in the MENA region, Qatar is predicted to have 65 days of heat wave conditions per year by 2020 under the Relative Concentration Pathway 8.5 (business-as-usual) modeling scenario, with this number expected to increase to 88 by 2050 (ESRI, 2017). Exposure to hot days may result in heat stroke while indirect impacts have been studied, including the increased risk of cardiovascular disease, worsening of respiratory conditions, risk of decreased kidney function, risk of adverse birth outcomes and the changes in distribution of vector-borne disease (Watts et al., 2018). Also, reduced labor productivity is already being seen in Gulf countries and elsewhere, which has a direct impact on both economic and well-being outcomes.

Cities in the MENA region are as diverse in character as any outside the region (Elsheshtawy, 2015): some have great wealth due to oil and gas reserves or a well-planned and diversified economy and some have serious economic challenges; some are gleaming examples of modernity, while others are informal and unplanned; some are engaged; some are rising international business centers, while others face high unemployment and lack of investment. Yet overall, many of these cities stand poised to take advantage of rich cultural and commercial histories, politically active populations (as in Cairo during the Arab Spring) and cultures of tolerance that could lead to successful/sustainable outcomes for the future.

Many recent studies emphasize the role of the alteration of the built environment as a strategy for heat mitigation, combating sea level rise and water scarcity (Göll, 2017), improvements to ecosystem and human health (Wilby and Perry, 2006; Tzoulas et al., 2007; Southon et al., 2018; Vieira et al., 2018) and energy conservation (Huang et al., 1987; Mcpherson, 1994; Akbari et al., 2001; McPherson et al., 2003). Commonly proposed interventions include both planning and architectural solutions – tree planting and increases in green or blue spaces (Oliveira et al., 2011; Qiu et al., 2017; Upreti et al., 2017), green roofs, window treatments and window placement, architectural materials which are thermally responsive (Santamouris et al., 2011), and lightening roads, roofs, and buildings to increase albedo (Radhi et al., 2017; Kyriakodis and Santamouris, 2018). However, no single strategy or group of strategies is suited for all locations, cultures and socio-economic circumstances. The combined pressures of climate change and rapid urbanization create an acute need for place-specific and human-centric planning and design practices.

With these challenges in mind, this Special Issue was proposed to gather some insights on current approaches to sustainable planning and design in the MENA region. This Special Issue comprises four papers that present several tools and planning approaches that add to the literature on sustainable planning in the region. They cover a range of infrastructure design, residential design and planning concepts with two papers focused on modeling approaches (Bensalah and Hammad) and two human-centric planning approaches (Randeree and Smits).

Certainly rail infrastructure has played an important role in economic development globally, and while the development of building information modeling has been widely adopted in the fields of building engineering and architecture, it is only recently being applied to infrastructure projects (Bradley et al., 2016). The paper by Bensalah et al. reviews the importance of the rail sector and its assets in economic, social and ecological terms and then focuses on benefits, risks and limitations of BIM in railway projects. The paper incorporates practical case studies of projects that have chosen the BIM approach and develops a summary of benefits and limitations of its use in relation to railway, as one type of infrastructure project. They note that BIM would not only optimize project costs and schedules leading to efficiency in the design and construction stages but may also optimize maintenance. It notes that the approach is limited by a lack of standards for its application to the rail sector, lack of a BIM charter, and that projects that apply it are not always well-documented in order to assess the effectiveness of the inclusion of BIM.

A second paper by Hammad also focuses on technical aspects of design by exploring optimal solutions to window design in the MENA region. It notes that the region is known for its extremely hot weather during Summer. The paper explores the problem of designing and locating windows on building facades based on relevant criteria to the region including solar heat gain, privacy, daylighting and cost of installation.

With a focus on residential dwellings in the MENA region, conflicting objectives are optimized using a lexicographic approach. Depending on the preference of criteria adopted in lexicographic optimization, the location of the windows on the building façade tends to change. The bi-objective analysis attempts to balance the daylight factor against each of privacy, solar heat gain and installation cost criteria. Using examples in three major cities in the MENA region, the research highlights the change in design alternatives depending on the local climatic condition. The proposed model provides designers with guidance through an automated support tool that yields optimized window designs and layout to ensure the sustainability of their designed buildings.

The remaining two papers focus on the social aspects of sustainable design in planning and architecture. Randeree, in “The social imperative in sustainable urban development: the case of Masdar City in the United Arab Emirates,” examines the social sustainability effectiveness of eco-cities through the case of Masdar City’s strategy for urban sustainability in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. The paper investigates the social, environmental and economic performance of Masdar City, a purported carbon-neutral, zero-waste urban development. The paper asserts that although Masdar City substantively contributes to innovation in sustainable urban development within environmental and economic contexts and has been effective in capital circulation in green technology markets, the impetus as a commercially driven enterprise is most evident and successful sustainable urban development requires greater consideration for the social imperative.

The final paper by Smits designs and evaluates a design approach for professionals that has the potential to increase residents’ self-reliance in constructing their built environment. The approach intends to enable professionals to advise impoverished rural communities on the methods of building and improving residential dwellings through their own labor and resources. Building on previous publications, the author devises a quasi-experiment to test the design approach within a DRM framework. The experiment and measurement of impact are described. The paper concludes with how the formulated quasi-experiment design will provide researchers working in comparable empirical research with a suitable framework. The framework and the experiment design are unique in their design and application in a vulnerable context, and offer an applicable framework for the increasing demand from humanitarian organizations.

While the total impacts of climate change and urbanization remain to be seen in the MENA region and globally, the challenges of innovative and effective planning and design are being taken up by municipal planners, architects and engineers. The papers in this SI are a contribution to the developing knowledge for the region.

References

Akbari, H., Pomerantz, M. and Taha, H. (2001), “Cool surfaces and shade trees to reduce energy use and improve air quality in urban areas”, Solar Energy, Vol. 70 No. 3, pp. 295-310, doi: 10.1016/S0038-092X(00)00089-X.

Bradley, A., Li, H., Lark, R. and Dunn, S. (2016), “BIM for infrastructure: an overall review and constructor perspective”, Automation in Construction, Vol. 71, pp. 139-152, doi: 10.1016/J.AUTCON.2016.08.019.

Bulkeley, H. and Betsill, M.M. (2003), Cities and Climate Change: Urban Sustainability and Global Environmental Governance, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London and New York, NY.

Bulkeley, H., Broto, V.C. and Edwards, G. (2012), “Bringing climate change to the city: towards low carbon urbanism?”, Local Environment, Vol. 17 No. 5, pp. 545-551, doi: 10.1080/13549839.2012.681464.

Elsheshtawy, Y. (2015), “The New Arab City”, in LeGates, R.T. (Ed.), City Reader, 6th ed., Routledge, London, pp. 328-337.

El-Zein, A., Jabbour, S., Tekce, B., Zurayk, H., Nuwayhid, I., Khawaja, M., Tell, T., Mooji, Y.A., De-Jong, J., Yassin, N. and Hogan, D. (2014), “Health and ecological sustainability in the Arab world: a matter of survival”, The Lancet, Vol. 383 No. 9915, pp. 458-476, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62338-7.

ESRI (2017), “Heatwaves: number of deadly heat days”, ESRI maps: global risk of deadly heat, available at: https://maps.esri.com/globalriskofdeadlyheat/# (accessed June 13, 2018).

Göll, E. (2017), “Future challenges of climate change in the MENA region”.

Huang, Y.J., Akbari, H., Taha, H. and Rosenfeld, A.H. (1987), “The potential of vegetation in reducing summer cooling loads in residential buildings”, Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology, Vol. 26 No. 9, pp. 1103-1116, doi: 10.1175/1520-0450(1987)026<1103:TPOVIR>2.0.CO;2.

Kyriakodis, G.-E. and Santamouris, M. (2018), “Using reflective pavements to mitigate urban heat island in warm climates – results from a large scale urban mitigation project”, Urban Climate, Vol. 24, pp. 326-339, doi: 10.1016/J.UCLIM.2017.02.002.

McPherson, E.G. (1994), “Energy-saving potential of trees in Chicago”, USDA Forest Service General Technical Report No. NE-186, Davis, CA.

McPherson, G., Simpson, J.R., McPherson, E.G. and Simpson, J.R. (2003), “Potential energy savings in buildings by an urban tree planting programme in California”, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 73-86, doi: 10.1078/1618-8667-00025.

Oliveira, S., Andrade, H. and Vaz, T. (2011), “The cooling effect of green spaces as a contribution to the mitigation of urban heat: a case study in Lisbon”, Building and Environment, Vol. 46 No. 11, pp. 2186-2194, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.04.034.

Pal, J.S. and Eltahir, E.A.B. (2016), “Future temperature in southwest Asia projected to exceed a threshold for human adaptability”, Nature Climate Change, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 197-200, doi: 10.1038/nclimate2833.

Qiu, G.Y., Zou, Z., Li, X., Li, H., Guo, Q., Yan, C. and Tan, S. (2017), “Experimental studies on the effects of green space and evapotranspiration on urban heat island in a subtropical megacity in China”, Habitat International, Vol. 68, pp. 30-42, doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.07.009.

Radhi, H., Sharples, S., Taleb, H. and Fahmy, M. (2017), “Will cool roofs improve the thermal performance of our built environment? A study assessing roof systems in Bahrain”, Energy and Buildings, Vol. 135, pp. 324-337, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.11.048.

Ramaswami, A., Weible, C., Main, D., Heikkila, T., Siddiki, S., Duvall, A., Pattison, A. and Bernard, M. (2016), “A socio-ecological-infrastructural systems framework for interdisciplinary study of sustainable city systems”, Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 16 No. 6, pp. 801-813.

Santamouris, M., Synnefa, A. and Karlessi, T. (2011), “Using advanced cool materials in the urban built environment to mitigate heat islands and improve thermal comfort conditions”, Solar Energy, Vol. 85 No. 12, pp. 3085-3102, doi: 10.1016/J.SOLENER.2010.12.023.

Southon, G.E., Jorgensen, A., Dunnett, N., Hoyle, H. and Evans, K.L. (2018), “Perceived species-richness in urban green spaces: cues, accuracy and well-being impacts”, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 172 December, pp. 1-10, doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.12.002.

Tzoulas, K., Korpela, K., Venn, S., Yli-Pelkonen, V., KaÅomierczak, A., Niemela, J. and James, P. (2007), “Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: a literature review”, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 81 No. 3, pp. 167-178, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division (2014), “World Urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision, highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352)”.

Upreti, R., Wang, Z.-H. and Yang, J. (2017), “Radiative shading effect of urban trees on cooling the regional built environment”, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, Vol. 26, pp. 18-24, doi: 10.1016/J.UFUG.2017.05.008.

Vieira, J., Matos, P., Mexia, T., Silva, P., Lopes, N., Freitas, C., Correia, O., Santos-Reis, M., Branquinho, C. and Pinho, P. (2018), “Green spaces are not all the same for the provision of air purification and climate regulation services: the case of urban parks”, Environmental Research, Vol. 160, December, pp. 306-313, doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.006.

Watts, N., Amann, M., Ayeb-Karlsson, S., Belesova, K., Bouley, T., Boykoff, M., Byass, P., Cai, W., Campbell-Lendrum, D., Chambers, J., Cox, P.M., Daly, M., Dasandi, N., Davies, M., Depledge, M., Depoux, A., Dominguez-Salas, P., Drummond, P., Ekins, P., Flahault, A., Frumkin, H., Georgeson, L., Ghanei, M., Grace, D., Graham, H., Grojsman, R., Haines, A., Hamilton, I., Hartinger, S., Johnson, A., Kelman, I., Kiesewetter, G., Kniveton, D., Liang, L., Lott, M., Lowe, R., Mace, G., Odhiambo Sewe, M., Maslin, M., Mikhaylov, S., Milner, J., Latifi, A.M., Moradi-Lakeh, M., Morrissey, K., Murray, K., Neville, T., Nilsson, M., Oreszczyn, T., Owfi, F., Pencheon, D., Pye, S., Rabbaniha, M., Robinson, E., Rocklöv, J., Schütte, S., Shumake-Guillemot, J., Steinbach, R., Tabatabaei, M., Wheeler, N., Wilkinson, P., Gong, P., Montgomery, H. and Costello, A. (2018), “The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: from 25 years of inaction to a global transformation for public health”, The Lancet, Vol. 391 No. 10120, pp. 581-630, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32464-9.

Wilby, R.L. and Perry, G.L.W.W. (2006), “Climate change, biodiversity and the urban environment: a critical review based on London, UK”, Progress in Physical Geography, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 73-98, doi: 10.1191/0309133306pp470ra.

Related articles