Performance Measurement in Health Care: The Case of Best/Worst Performers Through Administrative Data

Performance Measurement and Management Control: The Relevance of Performance Measurement and Management Control Research

ISBN: 978-1-78756-470-1, eISBN: 978-1-78756-469-5

ISSN: 1479-3512

Publication date: 4 October 2018

Abstract

This study investigates the stability of the “hospital effect” on performance over time by administrative health data as a source of evidence. Using 78,907 heart failure adult records from 117 hospitals in the Lombardy Region (Northern Italy) over three years (2010–2012), we analyzed hospital performance in terms of 30-day mortality and 30-day unplanned readmissions to gather evidence about the stability of the “hospital effect.” Best/worst performers were identified through multi-level models that combine both patient and hospital covariates. Our results confirm that managerial choices affect hospital performance, and that the “hospital effect” is not, contrary to expectations, stable over the short term. Performance improvement/worsening over the three years has been also analyzed.

Keywords

Citation

Roshanghalb, A., Mazzali, C., Lettieri, E. and Paganoni, A. (2018), "Performance Measurement in Health Care: The Case of Best/Worst Performers Through Administrative Data", Epstein, M., Verbeeten, F. and Widener, S. (Ed.) Performance Measurement and Management Control: The Relevance of Performance Measurement and Management Control Research (Studies in Managerial and Financial Accounting, Vol. 33), Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 243-257. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-351220180000033010

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2018 Emerald Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.