To read this content please select one of the options below:

External and Internal Validity of a Geographic Quasi-Experiment Embedded in a Cluster-Randomized Experiment

aUniversity of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
bNBER, Cambridge, MA, USA
cWellesley College, Wellesley, MA, USA
dMicrosoft AI and Research, Redmond, WA, USA

Regression Discontinuity Designs

ISBN: 978-1-78714-390-6, eISBN: 978-1-78714-389-0

Publication date: 13 May 2017


This chapter analyzes a geographic quasi-experiment embedded in a cluster-randomized experiment in Honduras. In the experiment, average treatment effects of conditional cash transfers on school enrollment and child labor were large – especially in the poorest experimental blocks – and could be generalized to a policy-relevant population given the original sample selection criteria. In contrast, the geographic quasi-experiment yielded point estimates that, for two of three dependent variables, were attenuated. A judicious policy analyst without access to the experimental results might have provided misleading advice based on the magnitude of point estimates. We assessed two main explanations for the difference in point estimates, related to external and internal validity.




We are grateful to Matias Cattaneo, Juan Carlos Escanciano, Luke Keele, Rocío Titiunik, the anonymous referees, and participants of the Advances in Econometrics conference at the University of Michigan for their helpful comments, without implicating them for errors or interpretations.


Galiani, S., McEwan, P.J. and Quistorff, B. (2017), "External and Internal Validity of a Geographic Quasi-Experiment Embedded in a Cluster-Randomized Experiment", Regression Discontinuity Designs (Advances in Econometrics, Vol. 38), Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 195-236.



Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2017 Emerald Publishing Limited